Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
February 2005

Parents’ Priorities and Satisfaction With Acute Pediatric Care

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Pediatrics, Kolding Hospital, Kolding, Denmark (Mr Ammentorp); and Department of Health Science (Dr Mainz) and Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine (Dr Sabroe), University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.


Copyright 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.2005

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(2):127-131. doi:10.1001/archpedi.159.2.127

Objective  To identify parents’ priorities and satisfaction in relation to pediatric care to assess nurses’ and physicians’ ability to provide care and treatment that fulfill parents’ needs.

Design, Setting, and Participants  The study took place in the pediatric ward of a regional hospital in Denmark. It included 300 parents of children admitted for acute care, and the data were collected by means of a self-administered questionnaire. After admission, parents were asked about priorities. After discharge from the hospital, parents were asked to report their level of satisfaction with the elements of care they had received during their stay.

Results  A total of 253 questionnaires were returned for the first section (a response rate of 84%), and 170 questionnaires were returned for the second section (response rate of 67%). The greatest gap between priorities and satisfaction was in the waiting time related to admission, waiting time related to fulfillment of the child’s needs, and information given about care and treatment. Parents were most satisfied with the nurses’ behavior; however, physicians’ performance was given the highest priority score.

Conclusions  Parents’ priorities and assessments of inpatient pediatric care rest heavily on the communication between physicians and parents. The present study pointed to the need for improved and clearer communication. In addition, the poor performance with regard to waiting time indicates that this is a major area for improvement.

The most important outcome of pediatric care is the improvement of the child’s health or reduction of symptoms. However, parents’ satisfaction is associated with such central outcomes, including adherence to the therapeutic regimen and understanding of medical information, that parents’ satisfaction with care can be considered a good proxy variable for some important aspects of quality of care.1 Unfortunately, until now, parental experience with pediatric inpatient care has not been carefully described. Study of the literature, however, identifies important problems in the quality of care, especially regarding the information available to and communication with parents.25

In general, satisfaction is considered a key measure in care quality, but variations from person to person in the importance of different issues often are not included in the studies. Importance can be measured by asking about priorities. The addition of priorities to a satisfaction theory prompts the question, What does the patient want? Priorities are attitudes and can be defined as the patient’s preferences or desires. They are evaluative or affective, describing a feeling in favor or disfavor of a service.68

Measuring priorities together with satisfaction gives knowledge not only about parents’ satisfaction but also about what the issues mean to the parents and to what degree they are evaluated as important. Therefore, identification of parents’ priorities may be an important instrument to improve ways of measuring care quality and may also help as a guideline when it comes to improving health care.9 The aims of this study were to identify parents’ priorities and assessments of pediatric care and to assess nurses’ and physicians’ ability to provide care and treatment that meet with parents’ needs.


Our study was a cross-sectional study in the pediatric ward of Kolding Hospital in Denmark. It took place during the months of January and February 2002.

Parents of children aged 2 months to 15 years who were admitted for acute care were enrolled consecutively when and if they arrived at the pediatric ward any day between 8 AM and 10 PM and if they were able to speak and understand Danish. The enrollment was not restricted to diagnosis or length of stay. A total of 300 parents were enrolled.


Parents who were hospitalized with their child were given a self-administered questionnaire divided into 2 sections. The first section was to be filled in immediately at admission and included questions about previsit priorities. The second section was to be filled in at discharge from the hospital, and in this part we asked the parents to report their level of satisfaction with the elements of care they had received during their stay. Parents who did not return the questionnaire were contacted by telephone 3 weeks from the day they had received it.


Based on several sources, including a systematic literature exploration of other studies about parent satisfaction with pediatric care and adult patients’ priorities and satisfaction with medical care,5,1019 a structured questionnaire was designed for this study. Items from 13 identified studies about patient satisfaction were used. They represented 87 different questions, and from them we selected 36 for our questionnaire. Some exploratory interviews with parents of children in pediatric care also took place. The criteria for selection of questions were (1) relevance to the target group of the study, (2) use in several studies, and (3) use in exploratory interviews in the ward. The questions reflected 6 dimensions of service quality:

  1. Access to care and treatment (8 items)

  2. Information and communication related to care and treatment (10 items)

  3. Information related to practical conditions (eg, showing parents around the ward) (3 items)

  4. Physicians’ behavior (5 items)

  5. Nurses’ behavior (6 items)

  6. Access to service (4 items)

For each item, the parents were asked to assess what they found most important (section 1) on a 5-point Likert scale, from extremely important to not important at all.

In section 2 of the questionnaire, filled in after discharge from the hospital, the parents were asked to reassess the same 36 items, now for an evaluation of care. Again the answers were arranged on a 5-point Likert scale, this time from very satisfied to not satisfied. The questionnaire also included items on parents’ characteristics: age, sex, education, and baseline data.We made a pretest of the questionnaire in a pilot study that included 15 parents. Afterward, internal reliability tests analyzed if the questionnaire was able to measure parents’ priority and satisfaction in a useful way. Using the Cronbach α, the internal reliability of each of the 6 dimensions of care was measured with the purpose of determining to what extent the items in the questionnaire related to each other and of analyzing how accurate, on average, the estimate of the true score was, as measured in a population of subjects.

The Cronbach α score for the 6 dimensions ranged from.78 (physicians’ behavior) to.91 (nurses’ behavior). The scores for the sixth dimension (access to service) ranged between.44 (satisfaction) and.50 (priority). The distribution of responses was approximately normal.


To describe the parents’ priorities and satisfaction, the mean score of each item was calculated using scores from 1 to 5 on the rating scale. This pattern is illustrated in a scatterplot (Figure 1) and was analyzed by comparing the mean of the priority score with the satisfaction score of each item. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS statistical software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill). Statistical significance was set at P<.05.

Figure 1.
Image not available

Scatterplot of priority mean score and satisfaction mean score for the 36 questions.


The purpose of the survey was explained to the parents. Anonymity was assured in a letter handed out to parents with the questionnaire. The Danish Scientific Ethical Committee approved the study.


A total of 253 section 1 questionnaires were returned (a response rate of 84%), and 170 section 2 questionnaires were returned (a response rate of 67%). Table 1 lists the characteristics of the parents.

Table 1. 
Image not available
Background Characteristics of Parents and Their Experience With an Ill Child

The majority of responders saw most aspects of care as important. Table 2 indicates that the aspects valued most in the total sample of parents were questions and information relating to care and treatment. For example, the item “Find out what is wrong with the child” (number 4) has a mean score of 4.6, and since the maximum score is 5.0, it tells us that nearly all parents view this problem as their highest priority. Other items with a high mean score are “Taking care of the child’s pain if it is relevant” (number 8) and “Explanation of the diagnosis/problem” (number 5). Items on practical information such as “The nurses show you around the ward” and “The nurses tell you about the ward procedures” were the lowest priorities, with a mean score of 2.8 (Table 2).

Table 2. 
Image not available
Parents’ Priorities and Satisfaction in Relation to Pediatric Inpatient Care Ranked According to the Priority Mean Score

As shown in Table 2, the lowest level of satisfaction was found for items such as “Waiting time in the ward for medical examination” (number 1; mean score, 3.0), “The child’s need has been taken care of, without waiting too long” (number 7), and questions related to information about and procedures in the ward. The parents were most satisfied with the nurses’ behavior and information given by the nurses, but items such as “Being involved in the care and treatment” (number 14) and “The physicians are kind” (number 19) also got a high score among parents.


The relationship between priorities and satisfaction is illustrated in Figure 1 in a scatterplot. The vertical axis represents the priority mean score, and the horizontal axis is the satisfaction mean score. Items in the upper left corner demand special attention. Parents’ satisfaction with the items in this area is rather low, although these services are given high priority (eg, “Waiting time in the ward for medical examination” [number 1], “The child’s need has been taken care of, without waiting too long” [number 7], and “Information about what is going to happen over the next days” [number 10]).

Items placed in the lower left corner also have a lower satisfaction score, but those in this area are given even lower priority, which indicates agreement between satisfaction and priority (eg, “The nurses show you around the ward” [number 24], “The nurses tell you about the ward procedures”[number 26], and “The nurses inform you how to find things in the ward” [number 25]).


The differences in nurses’ and physicians’ ability to fulfill parents’ needs are illustrated in Figure 2. It shows 5 scatterplots of priority mean scores and satisfaction mean scores for 5 items related to behavior.

Figure 2.
Image not available

Scatterplot of priority mean score and satisfaction mean score according to questions about nurses’ and physicians’ behavior.

For items such as understanding the information, kindness, and taking the parents’ experiences seriously, the physicians were given the highest priority score, indicating that from parents’ point of view, it is most important that the physicians demonstrate this behavior. Although the result is not significant, the satisfaction score for the same 3 items was highest for the nurses, showing that the parents were most satisfied with the nurses’ information (P = .06), kindness (P = .06), and ability to take the parents’ experiences seriously (P = .29). Nurses’ and physicians’ ability to express warmth and care were given the same priority score, but again parents were most satisfied with the nurses’ behavior (P = .04).

“The nurses show teaching ability” was the only item that was given the highest priority score in relation to the nurses, although it was not significant. Parents were also most satisfied with the nurses’ behavior according to this item (P = .04).


This study shows that medical care and treatment as well as information about care and treatment are issues highly ranked by parents. The lowest levels of satisfaction were reported for waiting time, information about the ward, and information about procedures. Whereas parents were most satisfied with the nurses’ behavior, items related to physicians were given the highest priority, except for showing teaching ability.

The response rates of 84% and 67% were considered acceptable for answering 2 anonymous questionnaires with 80 and 84 questions.20 It was possible to uncover some characteristics of the parents who did not reply to section 2 of the questionnaire because 72% of the parents who did not return this portion replied to section 1. An analysis of satisfaction scores according to parents’ background data showed no significant difference between the group that replied and that which did not; that is, the results were not biased.

The questionnaires used in the study were based on information identified in several other studies of parents’ needs, including our own exploratory interviews with parents of children in pediatric care. The large numbers of questions help elicit a broad perspective of patients’ priorities.21 The items reflected all dimensions of service that may influence parents’ satisfaction, including aspects of physicians’ and nurses’ behavior and information related to practical conditions. This means that the questionnaire can be regarded as a tool with content validity for the evaluation of needs in pediatric wards. The 6 dimensions of quality are very similar to the 7 dimensions used in a Swedish parent questionnaire19 developed from the Quality of Care Patient Questionnaire,22 an instrument showing good validity and reliability. In our questionnaire, the internal reliability of the 5 measurement indexes has been tested with the Cronbach α to be good, with an internal consistency of more than.78 in all but 1 index. According to the parents, most of the 36 aspects of care and treatment in the pediatric ward are important. This was expected because the aspects were selected according to their importance for parents.

The most important needs were those related to appropriate and accessible care and treatment as well as information about care and treatment. The less important needs were those related to service-oriented areas. These results correspond with the results of other studies of adult patients’ priorities in health care.23 By analyzing not only parent satisfaction but also the relationship between priorities and satisfaction in response to the individual questions, it is possible to highlight special areas in need of attention.24 Apparently only Homer et al5 have considered both frequency and importance in their study of the quality of pediatric care; they point out communication with parents as the area of highest priority for improvement.

The greatest gap between satisfaction and priority was in waiting time. This result is supported by another Danish study that shows that one third of patients are unsatisfied with waiting time.25 The pediatric physician in attendance will often have to decide on priorities because he or she is responsible for both inpatients and children admitted for acute care. For the less ill patients, it often means waiting. Unfortunately, waiting time as a factor influencing satisfaction is an understudied aspect of health care.26 Compared with other services, parents rated the priorities of receiving information about the ward and information about procedures in the ward relatively low. These results are consistent with a Finnish study of medical and surgical wards.27

Figure 1 shows that the ward generally met the highest priorities of parents and appropriately paid less attention to those elements of care that parents cared less about. The question is whether this is the true picture or just an expression of the parents’ not being able to distinguish between satisfaction and priority. Analyzing the scores using the Spearman ρ shows that the correlation between priority score and satisfaction score is not significant (P = .41), indicating that there is no relationship between priority and satisfaction and that the parents are able to distinguish between them. However, our model still has the important limitation that when parents’ ratings are turned into scores, it is not possible to say that a priority score of 4 results in a satisfaction score of 4.

The differences in physicians’ and nurses’ ability to meet parents’ needs could be explained by the uneven distribution of men and women (52 men and 201 women) if there were a difference between men’s and women’s priority scores and satisfaction scores for doctors’ and nurses’ behavior. However, an analysis of the results shows that this cannot explain the differences.

As shown in other studies, contact with the physician is of great importance.28,29 Spending little time with the patients could be one of the reasons for physicians’ not being able to fulfill parents’ needs to the same degree as the nurses.


This study has pointed out the most important items related to pediatric inpatient care as seen from the parents’ point of view. Our method makes it possible to clearly distinguish between nurses’ and physicians’ ability to fulfill parents’ needs, and the results show important differences that can lead to further investigations and to more specific quality development. Waiting time and communication with parents emerge as the highest priorities for improvement.

Back to top
Article Information

Correspondence: Jette Ammentorp, MHSc, Skullebjerg Alle 33, 7000 Fredericia, Denmark (

Accepted for Publication: August 16, 2004.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by the Lundbeck fund (Valby, Denmark) and by the research committees of Fredericia Hospital (Fredericia, Denmark) and Kolding Hospital.

Acknowledgment: We thank the staff at the Kolding Hospital pediatric ward for their assistance with the study.

Hall  JARoter  DLKatz  NR Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med Care 1988;26657- 675
Ammentorp  JRørmann  DMainz  JLarsen  L Measurement of the quality of care in a paediatric department. Ugeskr Laeger 2001;1637048- 7052
Dawson  KP Parenteral perceptions of paediatric inpatient care. N Z Med J 1991;10412- 13
Graham  DAAbbott  GDDawson  KP A paediatric day ward: parental expectations, perceptions and satisfaction. N Z Med J 1991;104405- 407
Homer  CJMarino  BCleary  PD  et al.  Quality of care at a children’s hospital: the parent’s perspective. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;1531123- 1129
Kravitz  RL Patients' expectations for medical care: an expanded formulation based on review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev 1996;533- 27
Ross  CKFrommelt  GHazelwood  LChang  RW The role of expectations in patient satisfaction with medical care. J Health Care Mark 1987;716- 26
Uhlmann  RFInui  TSCarter  WB  et al.  Patient request and expectations: definitions and clinical applications. Med Care 1984;22681- 685
Donabedian  A The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment.  Ann Arbor, Mich Health Administration Press1980;
Korsch  BMGozzi  EKFrancis  V Gaps in doctor-patient communication, I: doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics 1968;42855- 871
Kravitz  RL Measuring patients’ expectations and requests. Ann Intern Med 2001;134881- 888
Kravitz  RLCallahan  EJAzari  R  et al.  Assessing patients expectations in ambulatory medical practice: does the measurement approach make a difference? J Gen Intern Med 1997;1267- 72
Kravitz  RLBell  RAFranz  CE A taxonomy of requests by patients (TORP): a new system for understanding clinical negotiation in office practice. J Fam Pract 1999;48872- 878
Lewis  CCScott  DEPantell  RH Parent satisfaction with children’s medical care. Med Care 1986;24209- 215
Lochman  JE Factors related to patients’ satisfaction with their medical care. J Community Health 1983;991- 109
Putnam  SMStiles  WBJaco  MC  et al.  Patient exposition and physician explanation in initial medical interview. Med Care 1985;2374- 83
Schaffer  PVaughn  GKenner  C  et al.  Revision of a parent satisfaction survey based on the parent’s perspective. J Pediatr Nurs 2000;15373- 377
Street  RL  Jr Physicians' communication and parents' evaluations of pediatric consultations. Med Care 1991;291146- 1152
Ygge  BArnetz  JE Quality of paediatric care: application and validation of an instrument for measuring parent satisfaction with hospital care. Int J Qual Health Care 2001;1333- 43
Sitzia  JWood  N Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies. Int J Qual Health Care 1998;10311- 317
Peck  BM Measuring patient expectation. Med Care 2001;39100- 108
Arnetz  JEArnetz  BB The development and application of a patient satisfaction measurement system for hospital-wide quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care 1996;8555- 566
Grol  RWensing  MMainz  J  et al. European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP), Patients’ priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. Fam Pract 1999;164- 11
Ross  CKSteward  CASinacore  JM The importance of patient preferences in the measurement of health care satisfaction. Med Care 1993;311138- 1149
Mainz  J Problem Identification and Quality Assessment in the Health Care System.  Copenhagen, Denmark Munksgaard1996;
Leddy  KMKaldenberg  DOBecker  BW Timeliness in ambulatory care treatment: an examination of patient satisfaction and wait times in medical practices and outpatient test and treatment facilities. J Ambul Care Manage 2003;26138- 149
Lauri  SLepisto  MKappeli  S Patients’ needs in hospital: nurses’ and patients’ views. J Adv Nurs 1997;25339- 346
Dellholm-Lambertsen  B Upstairs and Downstairs: Parents,’ Doctors,’ and Nurses’ Understanding and Evaluation of Quality Related to the Hospitalisation and Treatment of Children Who Are Acutely Ill.  Århus, Denmark Aarhus University, Research Unit for General Practice1999;
Wright  EBHolbombe  CSalmon  P Doctor's communication of trust, care and respect in breast cancer: qualitative study. BMJ 2004;328864