Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
May 2007

Auditory Interhemispheric Transfer Deficits, Hearing Difficulties, and Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Abnormalities in Children With Congenital Aniridia Due to PAX6 Mutations

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Academic Unit of Audiological Medicine (Dr Bamiou and Ms Luxon) and Radiology and Physics Unit (Dr Gadian), Institute of Child Health, Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, Institute of Neurology (Drs Free and Sisodiya), and Division of Inherited Eye Disease, Institute of Ophthalmology, and Moorfields Eye Hospital (Mr Moore), University College London; Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital (Dr Chong); and Department of Neuro-otology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (Ms Luxon); London, England; Department of Communication Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs (Dr Musiek); and Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Edinburgh, Scotland (Dr Williamson and Ms van Heyningen).


Copyright 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.2007

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(5):463-469. doi:10.1001/archpedi.161.5.463

Objective  To assess auditory processing, hearing difficulties, and brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging abnormalities in children with panocular developmental aniridia due to PAX6 mutations.

Design  Case-control study.

Setting  Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health.

Participants  Eleven case subjects with PAX6 mutations and 11 age-matched and sex-matched healthy control subjects.

Interventions  All subjects completed a structured hearing questionnaire, baseline audiometry, and central auditory tests (dichotic speech tests, frequency and duration pattern tests, and gaps-in-noise test). Case subjects underwent brain MR imaging with volumetry, and the results were compared with those of age-matched and sex-matched healthy control subjects randomly selected from the Radiology and Physics Unit database.

Main Outcome Measures  Brain MR imaging, central auditory test results, and questionnaire scores.

Results  The corpus callosum area was significantly smaller on brain volumetry in the cases compared with the controls. The anterior commissure was small in 7 cases and was normal in 3 cases on visual inspection of brain MR images (conducted in 10 of 11 cases). Audiograms showed no abnormalities in any of the children. Central auditory test results were normal in all the controls and were abnormal in all the cases except for 1 case with a pattern of abnormalities consistent with reduced auditory interhemispheric transfer. The cases had greater difficulty localizing sound and understanding speech in noise than the controls.

Conclusions  Despite normal audiograms, children with PAX6 mutations may experience auditory interhemispheric transfer deficits and have difficulty localizing sound and understanding speech in noise. In view of their additional visual difficulties, thorough audiological evaluation of these children is indicated to initiate appropriate management.

Hearing is a cornerstone of communication in humans. Impaired brain structure or function may cause an auditory processing disorder with little effect on hearing thresholds but with deficits in other aspects of the hearing process.1 This disorder may affect as many as 7% of children.2 Auditory processing deficits may be associated with communication, learning, and other difficulties1; therefore, early identification and appropriate management of these disorders in children is crucial.

Findings from recent studies3,4 suggest the presence of auditory processing deficits in the form of impaired auditory interhemispheric transfer in adults with structural brain abnormalities due to PAX6 mutations. The PAX6 gene encodes a transcriptional regulator.5 Heterozygous PAX6 mutations are characterized by panocular features of developmental aniridia,5 while adult human heterozygotes show structural brain abnormalities. The anterior commissure is often absent or hypoplastic, and the corpus callosum is present but reduced in size on brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in adults with PAX6 mutations.6 Both of these structures contain auditory interhemispheric fibers.7

The objectives of this study were to demonstrate whether auditory interhemispheric transfer is impaired in children with PAX6 mutations (similar to adults) and whether this is associated with abnormalities on MR imaging of the brain and with parent-reported hearing difficulties in these children. Defects of interhemispheric auditory transfer might have implications for management in children bearing PAX6 mutations, as they already have visual disability.


This case-control study was conducted at Great Ormond Street Hospital and the Institute of Child Health from May 1, 2004, to May 31, 2006. It was approved by their joint ethics committee.


We recruited 11 case subjects (4 boys and 7 girls) who attended the ophthalmology clinic at Great Ormond Street Hospital for their visual difficulties. All children were in mainstream educational settings. Inclusion criteria for the case subjects were (1) aniridia diagnosed by 1 of us (A.T.M.), (2) a family history of congenital aniridia with a pattern indicating autosomal dominant inheritance or known PAX6 mutation in the family, and (3) an age of 7 years or older.

We recruited an equal number of healthy control subjects by sending an e-mail invitation to all hospital staff. Children of all grade levels of hospital staff were recruited and were matched to the subjects for age (±6 months), sex, handedness, and mean hearing thresholds (at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) in each ear. Informed consent was obtained from each tested child and from 1 of his or her parents.


All subjects (cases and controls) completed standard baseline audiometric tests, behavioral central auditory tests, and a short structured hearing questionnaire. Audiological assessment took place at the Academic Unit of Audiological Medicine, Institute of Child Health. Genetic testing had been previously performed in the cases for identification of the mutation. In addition, the cases underwent brain MR imaging with volumetry at the Radiology and Physics Unit, Institute of Child Health. Comparable MR images from an equal number of age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls randomly selected from the unit's database were used for comparison as control images.

Brain MR Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging acquisition techniques included conventional T1-weighted and T2-weighted multisection images and T1-weighted 3-dimensional fast low-angle shot images for volumetric and morphometric analyses. Imaging was performed on a 1.5-T MR imaging system (Magnetom Vision; Siemens, Ehrlangen, Germany).

One of us (S.L.F.) who was blinded to the subject's status (case or control) measured the corpus callosum area. Quantitative analysis was performed on the 3-dimensional T1-weighted images in 9 cases and in 9 corresponding controls.8,9

Standard Baseline Audiometric Tests

Pure-tone audiometry was carried out bilaterally using an audiometer (GSI 61; VIASYS Healthcare Inc, Conshohocken, Pa) with earphones (TDH-49; Northeastern Technologies, Glen Cove, NY) in a sound-treated room.10 Audiograms were considered normal if thresholds were better than 20-dB hearing level in each frequency tested across 500 Hz to 8 kHz.

Tympanometry was obtained bilaterally with a continuous probe signal tone of 226 Hz at 85-dB sound pressure level using a middle ear analyzer (GSI 33; Lucas-Grason-Stadler Inc, Littleton, Mass). Tympanogram findings were considered normal if middle ear pressure was greater than −150 mm H2O and compliance was greater than 0.3 cm3.

Transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements were carried out bilaterally using an analyzer with a standard default setup (ILO88/92; Otodynamics, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, England).11 The presence of normal transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (across 500-4000 Hz) was determined by an overall response amplitude signal-noise ratio of at least 6 dB and a waveform reproducibility of greater than 70% in at least 3 adjacent octave bands.12

Behavioral Central Auditory Tests

We conducted the following 3 tests: (1) dichotic speech tests, including digits,13 consonant vowel (CV) dichotic nonsense syllable test,14 and fused rhymed words,15 in which a different speech item is presented to each ear, and the listener has to repeat what he or she hears; (2) pattern tests (frequency16 and duration17), in which a sequence of sounds that differ in frequency or duration is presented monaurally and the listener has to label the sequence (eg, high, high, low); and (3) a temporal resolution test (gaps in noise18), in which the listener has to count the gaps embedded in a white noise segment.

All tests were available on CD and were administered using a CD player (Sony Corporation, Thatcham, Berkshire, England) and routed through the speech circuitry of the GSI 61 audiometer. All central auditory test material was presented at a 50-dB sensation level, with the sensation level referenced to the pure-tone audiogram mean (at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) after a brief practice session. The percentage of correct responses was calculated for each ear for all tests (as well as a threshold value for the gaps-in-noise test). Normative values were available for the dichotic digit, frequency pattern, duration pattern, and gaps-in-noise tests.


A structured hearing questionnaire was given to the parents to complete during the time their child was being tested (Table 1). The questions were selected on the basis of previously reported auditory difficulties experienced by patients with abnormalities of the interhemispheric pathway. The parent was asked to pick 1 of the following answers for each question: “almost never” (0 points), “occasionally” (1 point), “frequently” (2 points), or “almost always” (3 points).

Table 1. 
Image not available
Questionnaire Results in the Cases and Controls*

Outcomes of brain MR imaging included the volumetric results and the findings on visual inspection of the images. Other outcomes measures in the study were the questionnaire scores and the central auditory test results.


The results were analyzed using SPSS software version 12.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill). We used Mann-Whitney nonparametric tests to examine differences between the cases and the controls in questionnaire scores, corpus callosum cross-sectional area, and test scores for the tests without normative data (ie, the dichotic CV and dichotic rhyme tests). Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between questionnaire scores and test scores in the entire group.


Genetic mutation testing was performed by 1 of us (V.V.). The following are 5 major known subgroups of pathological alterations of PAX619,20: (1) haploinsufficiency, an intragenic mutation leading to a truncated or absent PAX6 protein, identified in 6 children (cases I:1, I:2, V:1, VII:1, VII:2, and VIII) in our study (Table 2); (2) inframe deletion due to a splicing error, identified in case IV:1; (3) mutation causing a predicted C-terminal protein extension, identified in case II:1; (4) missense mutation, identified in 3 children (cases III:1, III:2, and VI:1); and (5) deletion of the entire gene, which was not found in any of the children in this cohort.

Table 2. 
Image not available
Summary of Mutation, Brain Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging, and Main Central Auditory Test Findings in the Cases and Their Affected Parent

Structural brain MR imaging was conducted in 10 of 11 cases, and the images were inspected and reported on by 1 of us (W.K.C.). Compared with the controls, the anterior commissure was small in 7 cases and was normal in 3 cases. The corpus callosum was small in 4 cases and was normal in 5 cases, with a cyst in the splenium of the corpus callosum in case III:1 (Table 2). Overall, the brain MR images were completely normal only in case I:1.

Brain volumetry to measure the corpus callosum area was performed in 9 cases. The data were compared with the corpus callosum area of 9 randomly chosen age-matched healthy controls. The corpus callosum area was significantly smaller in the cases (P = .02, Mann-Whitney test).


All the cases and controls had normal tympanograms and pure-tone audiograms. They also had normal results on transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements.


Central auditory test results were normal in all of the controls. The results in the cases are summarized in Table 2; only case III:2 had entirely normal results on all of the central auditory tests.

Dichotic Speech Tests

On the dichotic digit test, all of the cases had normal results in the right ear, and 7 cases had abnormal results in the left ear. On the dichotic CV test, there was no significant difference in the right ear and left ear scores between the cases and the controls; these results are summarized in Table 3. On the dichotic rhyme test, there was no significant difference in the right ear scores between the cases and the controls, but the left ear scores were lower among the cases.

Table 3. 
Image not available
Dichotic Consonant Vowel (CV) and Dichotic Rhyme Test Results in the Cases and Controls
Frequency and Duration Pattern Tests and Gaps-in-Noise Test

Eight of 11 cases had abnormal results on the frequency pattern test. Ten of 11 cases had abnormal results on the duration pattern test. All of the cases except case VII:2 had normal results on the gaps-in-noise test.


Questionnaire results were obtained from parents of 9 cases and from 9 controls. The results are summarized in Table 1. The cases had significantly lower scores (denoting greater difficulty) for localizing sound and for understanding speech in noise (P = .03 for both).


To our knowledge, this is the first report of auditory processing test deficits, associated hearing difficulties (despite normal audiograms), and structural abnormalities of the auditory interhemispheric pathway on brain MR imaging in children with PAX6 mutations. In view of the additional visual disability associated with PAX6 mutations, our findings have implications for the management of these children, particularly in the classroom setting.

In adult humans, PAX6 mutations are associated with structural abnormalities of the interhemispheric pathway, with an absent or hypoplastic anterior commissure, and with a present (but in some cases smaller) corpus callosum.6 Both of these structures contain auditory interhemispheric fibers.7 In this pediatric study of PAX6 mutations, the main structural findings on brain MR imaging were a smaller anterior commissure and corpus callosum cross-sectional area in the cases than in the healthy controls. The corpus callosum findings are similar to the brain MR imaging abnormalities reported in adults with PAX6 mutations.6,8,21 However, there are some differences between the brain MR images in adult vs pediatric cases. In our pediatric sample, the anterior commissure was present in 10 of 10 imaged cases but was smaller than normal in 7 cases. In the series by Sisodiya et al,6 the anterior commissure was present in only 4 of 14 adult cases with PAX6 mutations. Free et al,8 reporting on the original 14 cases6 and an additional 10 cases, found the anterior commissure to be present in only 9 of 24 imaged adults with PAX6 mutations. In view of the small sample sizes in these studies, it is difficult to interpret the significance of the differences between the pediatric and adult findings. The differential effect of various mutations on the presence or absence of the anterior commissure needs to be considered. So far, no obvious genotype-phenotype correlations have been noted. It has been proposed that PAX6 may have a maintenance function in the adult eye.5 Therefore, the effect of age and the possibility of age-related degeneration of the interhemispheric structures should also be considered in a larger prospective pedigree study.

The functional role of the corpus callosum and the anterior commissure in audition has been examined in patients who have had these pathways sectioned. These subjects typically have normal results on monaural speech tests, with severely decreased left ear performance on dichotic digit and CV tests22 and with increased right ear performance on dichotic rhyme tests.23 The dichotic speech test findings have been explained based on the following 3 assumptions: (1) language perception takes place in the left hemisphere; (2) in the monaural situation, the ipsilateral and contralateral pathways are functional for sound transmission; and (3) in the dichotic situation, the contralateral pathway becomes dominant in auditory speech signal transmission. Therefore, in dichotic speech tests, speech stimuli from the left ear will be transmitted to the right (nonlanguage) hemisphere and will require transfer via the interhemispheric commissures to the left hemisphere for linguistic processing.24,25 For the frequency and duration pattern tests, it has been proposed that for a sequence of sounds the right hemisphere determines the pattern of the sequence as a gestalt, but the labeling of the sequence occurs in the left (language) hemisphere.26 Therefore, tasks that require labeling of sound sequences depend on transfer of information from the right hemisphere to the left hemisphere via interhemispheric commissures.26 In contrast, the gaps-in-noise test does not depend on callosal transfer. In our study, the constellation of auditory test abnormalities in 11 cases (ie, reduced left ear scores in the dichotic digit test, bilaterally reduced scores in the frequency and duration pattern tests, and normal results on the gaps-in-noise test) is consistent with findings in adults with PAX6 mutations.3,4 Our results are also similar to the test findings in patients with section of the posterior part of the corpus callosum albeit less severe.22,27 There are some subtle differences between test findings in children vs adults with PAX6 mutations. For example, children had a reduced left ear score in the dichotic rhyme test with no significant differences between the right ear and left ear scores on the dichotic CV test in our study, while adults had a significantly reduced left ear score on the dichotic CV test but no significant differences between the right ear and left ear scores on the dichotic rhyme test.4 It is not clear whether these differences are due to sample size, variation in brain MR imaging, or age-related or developmental changes of the auditory interhemispheric pathway.

There were some limitations in this study. We did not conduct any formal psychometric measures; therefore, the effect of IQ on the test results remains unknown. However, there were no concerns regarding low IQ for any of the children expressed by the parents or noted in their educational environments, and all of the children were in mainstream educational settings. Moreover, a study28 among adults with PAX6 mutations did not find any cognitive deficits compared with healthy controls. We did not examine the effect of any top-down processes (such as attention) on the test results. Furthermore, the number of cases was too small to make inferences about genotype-phenotype associations or structural brain abnormalities and test findings. Notwithstanding these limitations, the auditory processing deficits found in children with PAX6 mutations as a group are broadly similar to what has previously been reported in adults3,4 and are indicative of reduced auditory interhemispheric transfer.

It is interesting to compare our results with findings among subjects with congenital aplasia of the auditory interhemispheric pathway. Subjects with callosal agenesis, with or without an anterior commissure, may experience a range of central auditory deficits that include deficient phonological processing as shown on rhyming tasks,29 impaired sound localization,30 and dichotic speech test abnormalities with small but reliable ear asymmetries.3133 These auditory deficits are associated with educational difficulties29,34 in the absence of a close correlation between the auditory deficits and the subjects' IQ.35 Congenital aplasia or early life damage of the corpus callosum causes mild impairment of auditory interhemispheric transfer, which is probably related to development of alternative pathways resulting from brain plasticity.31,32 These reports are broadly consistent with our findings.

The finding of deficient auditory interhemispheric transfer in children may explain their parent-reported difficulties with localizing sound.32 Subjects with callosal agenesis are less accurate than control subjects in localizing fixed36 and moving32 sounds, as the auditory interhemispheric pathway may facilitate integration of binaural inputs in the 2 hemispheres. The deficient auditory interhemispheric transfer may similarly underline the parent-reported difficulties with understanding speech in noise. Processing of speech in background noise seems to activate both hemispheres.37 Oral language comprehension requires integration of semantic and syntactic information (processed in the left hemisphere) with prosodic information (processed in the right hemisphere), subserved by the corpus callosum.38 Presentation of oral language in noise may increase the complexity of this task. Interhemispheric interaction may, in this case, help increase the brain's processing capacity by dividing the processing demands of the complex auditory task between the 2 hemispheres, making maximum use of hemispheric specialization,39 and by recruiting other top-down executive functions (ie, attention).40 As observed in our study, the left ear deficit on the dichotic digit test may be an indirect measure of speech competition difficulties.

More than half of the children in our study with PAX6 mutations were also reported to have problems understanding prosody, although the difference between the cases and the controls was not significant. Patients with agenesis of the corpus callosum are reported to have difficulties with the pragmatic aspects of language in that they may interpret speech very literally or may misinterpret the meaning of nonliteral expressions such as idioms.4143

In conclusion, we demonstrated the presence of auditory processing deficits indicative of reduced auditory interhemispheric transfer and reported difficulties with localizing sound and understanding speech in noise among children with congenital aniridia due to PAX6 mutations, in the presence of normal audiograms and of MR imaging–documented abnormalities of the auditory interhemispheric pathway in the brain. The combined effect of auditory and visual difficulties may result in a significant handicap, particularly in the classroom setting. Thorough audiological evaluation of these children is indicated to initiate appropriate management in the form of auditory training and environmental modifications.44 Further research is needed to assess how the auditory deficits affect academic performance in children with PAX6 mutations and what is the best management to improve academic performance and communication in these children.

Back to top
Article Information

Correspondence: Doris-Eva Bamiou, MD, MSc, MPhil, Academic Unit of Audiological Medicine, Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford St, London WC1N 1EH, England (

Accepted for Publication: November 26, 2006.

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Bamiou, Musiek, Moore, Gadian, and Luxon. Acquisition of data: Bamiou, Chong, Williamson, van Heyningen, and Gadian. Analysis and interpretation of data: Bamiou, Free, Sisodiya, Chong, Musiek, van Heyningen, Moore, Gadian, and Luxon. Drafting of the manuscript: Bamiou, Chong, Musiek, Moore, and Gadian. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Bamiou, Free, Sisodiya, Chong, Musiek, Williamson, van Heyningen, Moore, and Luxon. Statistical analysis: Bamiou. Obtained funding: Bamiou and Luxon. Administrative, technical, and material support: Bamiou, Chong, Williamson, van Heyningen, Moore, Gadian, and Luxon. Study supervision: Musiek, Moore, and Luxon.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by the Sir Jules Thorn Charitable Trust (Seed Corn Fund).

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association,central auditory processing disorders 2005; August 22, 2006
Musiek  FEGollegly  KMLamb  LE  et al.  Selected issues in screening for central auditory processing dysfunction. Semin Hear 1990;11372- 383Article
Bamiou  DEMusiek  FEFree  SMitchell  TSisodiya  SMDavies  RA Evidence of defective auditory interhemispheric transfer in a patient with the PAX6 mutation and aplasia of the anterior commissure. Neurology 2004;62489- 490
Bamiou  DEMusiek  FESisodiya  SM  et al.  Deficient auditory interhemispheric transfer in patients with PAX6 mutations. Ann Neurol 2004;56503- 509
van Heyningen  VWilliamson  KA PAX6 in sensory development. Hum Mol Genet 2002;111161- 1167
Sisodiya  SMFree  SLWilliamson  KA  et al.  PAX6 haploinsufficiency causes cerebral malformation and olfactory dysfunction in humans. Nat Genet 2001;28214- 216
Pandya  DNSeltzer  BLepore  F, Ptito M, Jasper HH, eds.ed The topography of commissural fibers. Two Hemispheres–One Brain: Functions of the Corpus Callosum. New York, NY Alan R Liss Inc1986;47- 73
Free  SLMitchell  TNWilliamson  KA  et al.  Quantitative MR image analysis in subjects with defects in the PAX6 gene. Neuroimage 2003;202281- 2290
Mitchell  TNFree  SLMerschhemke  MLemieux  LSisodiya  SMShorvon  SD Reliable callosal measurement: population normative data confirm sex-related differences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24410- 418
British Society of Audiology, Recommended procedure for pure-tone audiometry using a manually operated instrument. Br J Audiol 1981;15213- 216
Kemp  DTRyan  SBray  P A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990;1193- 105
Hurley  RMMusiek  FE Effectiveness of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in predicting hearing level. J Am Acad Audiol 1994;5195- 203
Musiek  FE Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: the dichotic digit test revisited. Ear Hear 1983;479- 83
Noffsinger  DMartinez  CDWilson  RH Dichotic listening to speech: background and preliminary data for digits, sentences, and nonsense syllables. J Am Acad Audiol 1994;5248- 254
Wexler  BEHalwes  T Increasing the power of dichotic methods: the fused rhymed words test. Neuropsychologia 1983;2159- 66
Musiek  FE Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol 1994;5265- 268
Musiek  FEBaran  JAPinheiro  ML Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cochlear lesions. Audiology 1990;29304- 313
Musiek  FEShinn  JJirsa  RBamiou  DEBaran  JAZaida  E GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear Hear 2005;26608- 618[published correction appears in Ear Hear. 2006;27:228]
Mitchell  TNFree  SLWilliamson  KA  et al.  Polymicrogyria and absence of pineal gland due to PAX6 mutation. Ann Neurol 2003;53658- 663
Welcome to the human PAX6 allelic variant database Web site,Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit August 22, 2006
Ellison-Wright  ZHeyman  IFrampton  I  et al.  Heterozygous PAX6 mutation, adult brain structure and fronto-striato-thalamic function in a human family. Eur J Neurosci 2004;191505- 1512
Musiek  FEReeves  AIn:  Lepore F, Ptito M, Jasper HH, eds.edEffects of partial and complete corpus callosotomy on central auditory function.Two Hemispheres–One Brain: Functions of the Corpus Callosum. New York, NY Alan R Liss Inc1986;423- 434
Musiek  FEKudziel-Schwan  SKibbe  KSGollegly  KMBaran  JARintelmann  WF The dichotic rhyme test: results in split-brain patients. Ear Hear 1989;1033- 39
Zaidel  ELepore  F, Ptito M, Jasper HH, eds.edCallosal dynamics and right hemisphere languageTwo Hemispheres–One Brain: Functions of the Corpus Callosum. New York, NY Alan R Liss Inc1986;435- 461
Musiek  FEPinheiro  MLPinheiro  ML, Musiek FE, eds.edDichotic speech tests in the detection of central auditory dysfunctionAssessment of Central Auditory Dysfunction: Foundations and Clinical Correlates. Baltimore, Md Waverly Press1985;201- 218
Pinheiro  MLMusiek  FESequencing and temporal ordering in the auditory system. In: Assessment of Central Auditory Dysfunction: Foundations and Clinical Correlates. Baltimore, Md Waverly Press1985;219- 238
Sugishita  MOtomo  KYamazaki  K  et al.  Dichotic listening in patients with partial section of the corpus callosum. Brain 1995;118417- 427
Thompson  PJMitchell  TNFree  SL  et al.  Cognitive findings in humans with mutations in PAX6Neurology 2004;621216- 1218
Temple  CMJeeves  MAVilarroya  OO Reading in callosal agenesis. Brain Lang 1990;39235- 253
Lepore  FLassonde  MPoirier  PLassonde  M, Jeeves MA, eds.ed Midline sensory integration in callosal agenesis. Callosal Agenesis: A Natural Split Brain: Advances in Behavioural Biology.Vol 42. New York, NY Plenum Publishing Corp1994;155- 170
Santhouse  AMFfytche  DHHoward  RJ  et al.  The functional significance of perinatal corpus callosum damage: an fMRI study in young adults. Brain 2002;1251782- 1792
Lessard  NLepore  FVillemagne  J  et al.  Sound localization in callosal agenesis and early callosotomy subjects: brain reorganization and/or compensatory strategies. Brain 2002;1251039- 1053
Sauerwein  HCNolin  PLassonde  MLassonde  M, Jeeves MA, eds.ed Cognitive functioning in callosal agenesis. Callosal Agenesis: A Natural Split Brain: Advances in Behavioural Biology. Vol 42. New York, NY Plenum Publishing Corp1994;221- 234
Jacobson  IJeeves  MALassonde  M, Jeeves MA, eds.ed A new syndrome: familial fronto-nasal dermoid cysts with agenesis of the corpus callosum. Callosal Agenesis: A Natural Split Brain: Advances in Behavioural Biology. Vol 42. New York, NY Plenum Publishing Corp1994;39- 54
Temple  CMIlsley  JLassonde  M, Jeeves MA, eds.ed Sounds and shapes: language and spatial cognition in callosal agenesis. Callosal Agenesis: A Natural Split Brain: Advances in Behavioural Biology. Vol 42. New York, NY Plenum Publishing Corp1994;261- 274
Poirier  PMiljours  SLassond  MLepore  F Sound localization in acallosal human listeners. Brain 1993;11653- 69
Scott  SKRosen  SWickham  L  et al.  A positron emission tomography study of the neural basis of informational and energetic masking effects in speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115813- 821
Friederici  ADAlter  K Lateralization of auditory language functions: a dynamic dual pathway model. Brain Lang 2004;89267- 276
Passarotti  AMBanich  TMSood  RK  et al.  A generalized role of interhemispheric interaction under attentionally demanding conditions: evidence from the auditory and tactile modalities. Neuropsychologia 2002;401082- 1096
Banich  MT The missing link: the role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing. Brain Cogn 1998;36128- 157Article
Jeeves  MATemple  CM A further study of language function in callosal agenesis. Brain Lang 1987;32325- 335
O’Brien  GLassonde  M, Jeeves MA, eds.ed The behavioral and developmental consequences of callosal agenesis. Callosal Agenesis: A Natural Split Brain: Advances in Behavioural Biology. Vol 42. New York, NY Plenum Publishing Corp1994;235- 246
Paul  LKVan Lancker-Sidtis  DSchieffer  B  et al.  Communicative deficits in agenesis of the corpus callosum: nonliteral language and affective prosody. Brain Lang 2003;85313- 324
Bamiou  DECampbell  NSirimanna  TS Management of auditory processing disorders. Audiological Med 2006;446- 56Article