[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.176.30. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Editorial
March 2014

Accuracy in Reporting Past Psychiatric SymptomsThe Role of Cross-sectional Studies in Psychiatric Research

Author Affiliations
  • 1National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(3):233-234. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4111

Cross-sectional studies remain a major source of data for research, practice, and policy, despite well-known limitations of this approach in assessing psychopathology. Such studies are especially valuable when the intent is to identify current or recent cases and in repeated studies where trends in rates can be examined. Yet, how well do they identify psychiatric symptoms and syndromes from the past? This is not a trivial question because the accuracy of such classification is important for association studies and, in particular, for clinical neuroscience and genetic studies where the accuracy of phenotypic classification is essential to determining the relationship of predictors and purported outcomes.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×