Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Views 2,622
Citations 0
June 2014

Requests for Euthanasia/Physician-Assisted Suicide on the Basis of Mental SufferingVulnerable Patients or Vulnerable Physicians?

Author Affiliations
  • 1Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
  • 2Department of Supportive and Palliative Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium

Copyright 2014 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(6):617-618. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.185

In only a few countries, such as Belgium and the Netherlands, and in some states in the United States, euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide (EAS) is legally possible under some circumstances. Arguments in favor of legalization of EAS are that it might function as a safeguard to semilegal practices, that it fosters transparency, and that it enables one to verify whether criteria of due care are met. It also provides legal safety for the physicians involved. In these places, EAS has increasingly become an acceptable option for patients with serious irreversible diseases, such as cancer, that are accompanied by unbearable physical suffering and that finally lead to death.1 Euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide in cases of mental suffering, however, is much more controversial. In Belgium, euthanasia for mental suffering is possible under certain extra due care conditions, such as the advice of 2 other physicians. In 2011, “unbearable mental suffering due to an irreversible disease” was the only motive for euthanasia in 3.5% of all the reported euthanasia cases (N = 1133) in Belgium (Figure).2 However, requests for euthanasia based on unbearable mental suffering are much more common.3

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview