[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.5.76. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Commentary
August 1999

Almost PersuadedReactions to Oldham et al

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(8):697-698. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.8.697

AS MEMBERS of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC), we are grateful to Oldham et al for their careful and thoughtful analysis and critique of the NBAC's most recent report.1 Their analysis demonstrates a clear grasp of both what the NBAC recommended and what reasoning lay behind these recommendations. We are pleased that they agree that many—perhaps most—of the NBAC's recommendations identify valuable protections for potential research subjects. We offer a few observations and responses to their article.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×