[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.82.105. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 366
Citations 0
Comment & Response
February 2015

Brain Lactate as a Potential Biomarker for Comorbid Anxiety Disorder in Autism Spectrum Disorder—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute for the Developing Mind, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
  • 2Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
  • 3Division of Child Neurology, Rady Children’s Hospital of San Diego, San Diego, California
  • 4Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
  • 5New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(2):190-191. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2425

In Reply In their letter, Dager et al suggest several ways in which the findings of our study1 could be strengthened.

First, they posit that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) structural changes would support the interpretation that elevated brain lactate is secondary to mitochondrial dysfunction. However, a review on this topic concluded that “neither normal brain MRI nor normal [magnetic resonance spectroscopy] can exclude the diagnosis of respiratory chain deficiency.”2 It has long been known that MRI structural changes may or may not be present in mitochondrial diseases, and their absence does not exclude the presence of mitochondrial disease. Moreover, in a sample of autistic individuals who were not preselected on the basis of having classic mitochondrial disease, as in the sample we studied, it seems likely that structural brain MRI changes would be even less common. (It is worth noting that we did acquire structural data in this sample but the anatomical findings have yet to be reported.) Finally, the lactate elevations seem to have been uniquely localized in specific brain regions of these participants, suggesting that anatomical abnormalities, even if present, would have been highly localized and different across participants, making their detection difficult.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×