[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 2,870
Citations 0
Original Investigation
June 14, 2017

Efficacy of a Maternal Depression Prevention Strategy in Head StartA Randomized Clinical Trial

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 3Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 4Department of Psychiatry, Children’s Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 5Department of Psychiatry, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
  • 6Data Coordinating Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 7Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Psychiatry. Published online June 14, 2017. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1001
Key Points

Question  Is a lay-delivered, problem-solving intervention embedded in Head Start efficacious in preventing clinically important depressive symptom episodes among at-risk, low-income mothers?

Findings  In this randomized clinical trial of 230 Head Start mothers, those receiving problem-solving education experienced a 60% incident rate of depressive symptom episodes compared with those not receiving it. Among the subpopulation with low symptom levels at baseline, those receiving problem-solving education experienced a 39% incident rate.

Meaning  The efficacy of problem-solving education demonstrates the promise of embedding maternal depression prevention programs in Head Start; additional effectiveness studies are necessary to develop meaningful public health programs.

Abstract

Importance  Low-income and minority mothers experience a disproportionate incidence of depression and lack access to treatment services. Development of prevention strategies in accessible community-based venues is a potentially important public health strategy.

Objective  To determine the efficacy of a depression prevention strategy embedded in Head Start.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This randomized clinical trial was performed from February 15, 2011, through May 9, 2016, at 6 Head Start agencies serving families at or below the federal poverty level. Participants included mothers with depressed mood, anhedonia, or depression history but who were not in a current major depressive episode. Participants were followed up for 12 months with masked outcome assessments. Final follow-up was completed on May 9, 2016.

Interventions  Participants were randomized to a problem-solving education (PSE) intervention (n = 111) or usual Head Start services (n = 119).

Main Outcomes and Measures  Primary outcomes were problem-solving skills and depressive symptoms. To capture the chronicity and intensity of symptoms, the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms was administered bimonthly, and rates of clinically significant symptom elevations were compared across groups. Secondarily, the presence of a major depressive episode was assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders.

Results  Among the 230 participants, 152 (66.1%) were Hispanic, with a mean (SD) age of 31.4 (7.3) years. An intention-to-treat analysis among 223 participants contributing follow-up data found no differences in problem-solving skills across groups. The mean (SD) number of depressive symptom elevations among the PSE participants was 0.84 (1.39) compared with 1.12 (1.47) among the usual service participants (adjusted incident rate ratio [aIRR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.90). In analyses stratified according to baseline depressive symptoms, PSE exerted a preventive effect among those with lower-level baseline symptoms, with a mean (SD) of 0.39 (0.84) elevations among PSE participants compared with 0.88 (1.37) among usual service participants (aIRR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.21-0.75). However, no difference was observed among those with higher-level baseline symptoms (mean [SD] elevations, 2.06 [1.92] for PSE and 2.00 [1.91] for usual service; aIRR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.67-1.80). Analysis of symptom scores followed the same pattern, with an adjusted mean reduction of 1.33 (95% CI, 0.36-2.29) among participants with lower-level baseline symptoms.

Conclusions and Relevance  The PSE intervention is efficacious in preventing depressive symptom episodes and performs optimally among those with initial low-level symptoms. Additional effectiveness studies in Head Start are necessary to develop meaningful public health programs.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01298804

×