[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
December 1964

Advances in Psychoanalysis.

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1964;11(6):680. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1964.01720300110017

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


The overall feeling, after having read this volume, is disappointment that the authors did not enlarge on the many excellent clinical examples. Because of this, the wide range of essays becomes somewhat an oversimplified vade mecum for those interested in analytic parameters. Will there be no end to substitutive terms? It seems that every group dedicated to psychoanalytic work chronically seeks out synonyms that are then made separate from their origins; for example, abused equals masochistic; paucity of inner experience equals denial; alienation equals isolation; holistic equals unity; and so forth.

Kelman's hazy introduction traces the defection of Horney from the ranks of "orthodox" psychoanalysis. No one would dispute the fresh orientations and correlations that Jones suggested that psychoanalysis would need as time passed, but the insistence that Freud's writings demonstrate "a pessimistic, materialistic, constitutional and sex centered philosophy" is a scotoma of major proportions.

He further implements Horney's concepts

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview