[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.167.142.229. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1968

Personal Differences in Perceptual Deprivation

Author Affiliations

Fort Steilacoom, Wash
From the Division of Research, Department of Institutions, Fort Steilacoom, Wash. Dr. Garlington is now at the Washington State University, Pullman, Wash; Dr. Ganzer at the Cascadia Diagnostic Center, Tacoma, Wash; and Mr. Collins at the University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky.

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1968;19(2):146-154. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1968.01740080018004
Abstract

A PERSON cut off from meaningful sensory stimulation is literally on his own. What significance he puts into his experience comes largely from him. Perceptual or sensory deprivation can be, in Goldberger's phrase, a walk-in inkblot. Reactions vary from something very like psychosis to pleasant enjoyment. It has been suggested that deprivation, like the hallucinogens, offers an experimental analogue of psychosis. As with the LSD experience much depends upon the atmosphere in which the experiment takes place. But under standard conditions almost every worker has found substantial variation in how his individual subjects react. Would deprivation be a useful tool in individual assessment? Does it measure the individual's potential for psychosis? Does the variability of individual reactions shed any light upon the theoretical explanations of the effects of deprivation? Lindsley1 links the effects of deprivation to the need of the reticular activating

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×