[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
March 1974

Shame and Guilt in Family RelationsTheoretical and Clinical Aspects

Author Affiliations

Bethesda, Md
From the Family Studies Section, Adult Psychiatry Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1974;30(3):381-389. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1974.01760090087014

Shame and guilt denote painful and complex experiences. These interweave with, yet also differ from, each other. The three psychoanalytic constructs of ego-ideal, conscience, and self-observation—all forming part of the superego—illuminate their differing dynamics. Often shame and guilt recur sequentially in shame-guilt or guiltshame cycles.

This report describes shame-guilt cycles, also called shame-guilt binds, in families. It distinguishes between marital (vertical) and intergenerational (horizontal) shame-guilt cycles or binds. In each case, complex homeostatic processes come into play. Pseudomutual and pseudohostile families, as described by Wynne et al, reveal typical variations of these processes. To an extent, such homeostatic features of shame and guilt serve positive functions, but easily become restrictive, and then interfere with each member's individuation and separation. When this happens, they must become a focus for interpretative psychotherapeutic intervention.

The family therapist must work toward the voluntary acceptance, rather than the forced admission, of shame and guilt. Also, he must be able to deal with family myths and must see the above binds in a multigenerational perspective.