[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
July 1974

Patients Evaluate Therapists

Author Affiliations

Los Angeles; Washington, DC
From the University of Southern California School of Medicine and the Adult Psychiatric Outpatient Clinic at the Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles (Dr. Kline); the Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles (Dr. Adrian); and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC (Dr. Spevak).

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1974;31(1):113-116. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1974.01760130087015

Psychiatric outpatient services were evaluated by patients coming for their first interview, continuing in therapy, and those terminating prematurely. Questionnaires were used to evaluate the patients' experience in making appointments, registering, therapist's interest, appearance, and service generally. The perceived values of medication, insight, and specific direction were evaluated.

Patients still in therapy gave generally favorable responses. For dissatisfied patients the main focus is the therapist's interest, not contact with other clinic procedures and personnel. The value of insight and specific directions together with the perceived therapist interest are the major sources of dissatisfaction. Appearance and medication seem least important.

It seems clear that if one wishes a critical evaluation to improve service we should go to our patients who have prematurely stopped treatment rather than to patients continuing in therapy.