[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.124.106. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 1980

Debate on Psychiatric Epidemiology-Reply

Author Affiliations

Departments of Psychiatry and Epidemiology Yale University School of Medicine and Connecticut Mental Health Center 904 Howard Ave, Suite 2A New Haven, CT 06519
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration Parklawn Bldg, Room 12-105 5600 Fishers Lane National Institute of Mental Health Rockville, MD 20857

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1980;37(12):1423-1424. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780250109014
Abstract

The opportunity to debate publicly one of the leaders of psychiatric epidemiology about its history and future directions is a privilege. With regard to its history, it makes little difference whether the post-World War II investigators avoided psychiatric diagnoses because of ideology or practical considerations about reliability and feasibility; the consequences were the same. The major community surveys relied heavily on overall impairment scales independent of specific diagnoses as the dependent measures.

While some investigators, including Dr Srole and his associates, may not have intentionally adopted the view that mental health and illness were on a continuum, this theoretical position was in fact expressed in their research. In the mid 1950s, it was a viewpoint expressed by several prestigious scientific groups, including the National Advisory Mental Health Council, and by a series of conferences on psychiatric epidemiology sponsored by the Milbank Memorial Fund and the World Health Organization.1-3

However,

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×