[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.128.52. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 1980

DSM-III vs DSM-II: How Much More Reliable?

Author Affiliations

Department of Psychiatry University of Iowa Iowa City, IA 52242

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1980;37(12):1426. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780250112016
Abstract

To the Editor.—  Cantwell and his colleagues presented a series of four articles1-4 comparing DSM-II and DSM-III in the diagnosis of childhood psychiatric disorders. Summarizing the results, they conclude that "DSMIII, with additional refinement, gives promise of being a very usable and reliable classification system for the diagnosis of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents."4(p1228) However, whether one agrees with this conclusion appears to be a case of whether one sees the glass as being half full or half empty. Specifically, it is difficult to agree with the authors' conclusions that the interrater reliability of DSM-III, as well as the raters' agreement with the expected diagnosis, are acceptable. The reliability figures presented are modest, at best, and for a variety of reasons are probably inflated estimates of the true reliabilities. The reasons for this conclusion will be briefly discussed.The experimental procedure used by the authors involved presenting

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×