[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.129.96. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
November 1981

The Road to Nosologic Nirvana-Reply

Author Affiliations

New York State Psychiatric Institute 722 W 168th St New York, NY 10032

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38(11):1299-1300. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780360115016
Abstract

In Reply.—  With the current availability of DSM-III, is it now inappropriate to report on research studies that diagnosed disorders according to DSM-II? Certainly not. It would be absurd to reject a well-designed study merely because patient selection antedated the availability of DSM-III. Nosologic research did not begin with DSM-III even if (we hope) the innovations of DSM-III facilitate such studies.Is It Accurate to Refer to the DSM-II 'Criteria' for Schizophrenia?—In the article in question, Silverstein and Harrow state that "Diagnoses were determined by the consensus of two senior clinicians using standard diagnostic criteria (DSM-II)....."I submit that it is gilding the lily to refer to the general six-sentence DSM-II description of schizophrenia as "criteria." To do so is to obscure the most important advance in nosologic research that occurred in the 1970s after the publication of DSM-II: the provision of specified inclusion and exclusion criteria for making

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×