[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.159.197.114. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 1988

An Efficacy Study of Isocarboxazid and Placebo in Depression, and Its Relationship to Depressive Nosology

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Psychiatry, Veterans Administration Medical Center and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (Dr Davidson); Departments of Psychiatry, West Haven (Conn) Veterans Administration Medical Center and Yale University, New Haven, Conn (Dr Giller); Department of Psychiatry, University of California at San Diego (Dr Zisook); and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (Dr Overall).

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45(2):120-127. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800260024003
Abstract

• Isocarboxazid and placebo were evaluated in 130 anxious depressives. Drug was superior to placebo on depression, anxiety, interpersonal sensitivity, and global measures, and on symptoms of hostility, anxiety, obsessiveness, and psychological-cognitive components of depression. There were no significant differences between treatment effects on psychomotor and typical vegetative symptoms. Isocarboxazid was more effective than placebo in major, but not in minor, depression. It was significantly more effective in depression classified as endogenous depression or melancholia by various diagnostic criteria. Drug was more effective than placebo in atypical depression with vegetative reversal and in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)—derived profiles of anxious and hostile depression; there were no drug-placebo differences in atypical depression without vegetative reversal, or in BPRS retarded and agitated/excited depression. Interpersonal sensitivity emerged as an important drug-responsive dimension.

×