[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.159.129.152. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 1988

The Meaning of Full DisclosureCollegial Trust in Science

Author Affiliations

Editor UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute 760 Westwood Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90024

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45(7):689-691. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800310099017
Abstract

There are some disparate and constructive general considerations on behalf of science communications far transcending any particular issues evoked by the nowwithdrawn article reported in the letters department in this issue of the Archives. The reporting of science is a complex but gratifying activity, and the intent of any "rules" governing it should be shared. Thus, our "Instructions for Authors" contains a very brief essay entitled "Obligations for Full Disclosure." It fundamentally addresses a collegial rather than defensive intent animating the information exchanges that are central to scientific activities. Such exchanges are both formal (published reports) and informal. Informal inquiries between authors and the Editor are a normal part of the full exchanges that we encourage in our instructions and, in fact, do receive and initiate. The aim in all of our discourse, formal and informal, is positive. It is to clarify the basis for differences and to stimulate evidentiary

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×