[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.150.215. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 1989

Linkage Studies of Bipolar Disorder: Methodologic and Analytic IssuesReport of MacArthur Foundation Workshop on Linkage and Clinical Features in Affective Disorders

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Psychiatry and Epidemiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (Dr Merikangas); the Departments of Psychiatry and Biomathematics, UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute (Dr Spence); and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh (Pa) School of Medicine, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic (Dr Kupfer).

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46(12):1137-1141. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810120079012
Abstract

• To review the findings of the linkage studies of affective disorders, a workshop, "Linkage and Clinical Features in Affective Disorders," was organized by the MacArthur Foundation Mental Health Research Network I on the Psychobiology of Depression meeting in Alexandria, Va, April 13 to 15, 1989. The major goals of the workshop for affective disorders were to explore the relationship between genetic and clinical heterogeneity, to identify major impediments to linkage studies, and to develop recommendations for the application of standardized methods of conducting linkage studies. The participants in the conference presented detailed demographic and clinical data from most of the published linkage studies of affective disorders. No systematic correspondence between genetic and clinical subtypes of bipolar disorder pedigrees was evident. The major problems hampering the linkage analyses of psychiatric disorders that were identified follow: (1) the major psychiatric disorders—the affective disorders in particular—constituting complex human disorders; (2) the lack of valid definitions of affective disorders; (3) comorbidity between the affective disorders with other disorders; (4) nonrandom mating; (5) a cohort effect, with younger birth cohorts exhibiting higher rates of affective disorders; and (6) the lack of replication of current linkage studies. The recommendations that were made for linkage study designs that incorporate some of the complexities of the affective disorders are reported.

×