Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
July 1990

Outcome in Manic DisordersA Naturalistic Follow-up Study

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychiatry, Michael Reese Hospital and Medical Center (Dr Harrow and Mr Goldberg), the Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois College of Medicine (Dr Harrow), Committee on Human Development and Department of Psychology, University of Chicago (Dr Harrow), Northwestern University Medical School (Mr Goldberg), Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology and Social Sciences, Rush University, and Isaac Ray Center, Section on Psychiatry and the Law, Rush-Presbyterian—St Luke's Medical Center (Dr Grossman), Chicago, Ill; and Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Meltzer).

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990;47(7):665-671. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810190065009

• To study outcome in manic patients treated under routine clinical conditions, 73 manic and 66 unipolar depressed patients were followed up 1.7 years after hospitalization. A surprisingly large percentage of manic patients showed difficulty in post-hospital adjustment, and over 40% experienced a manic syndrome during the follow-up period. Manic patients showed poorer outcomes than did unipolar depressives. Manic patients taking lithium carbonate did not show better outcome than those not taking lithium carbonate. The results suggest (1) many hospitalized manic patients have a severe, recurrent, and pernicious disorder; and (2) in routine clinical practice, lithium carbonate treatment is an effective prophylaxis for fewer than the 70% to 80% of manic patients previously reported.