[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.159.129.152. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1992

The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID)II. Multisite Test-Retest Reliability

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, and the New York State Psychiatric Institute (Drs Williams, First, and Spitzer, Ms Gibbon, and Mr Davies); Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Mass (Drs Borus and Howes); Department of Psychiatry, Hillside Hospital, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Glen Oaks, NY (Dr Kane); Harvard Medical School, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Mass (Dr Pope); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University Medical School, Substance Abuse Treatment Unit, New Haven, Conn (Dr Rounsaville); and the Max Planck Institute for Psychiatry, Munich, Federal Republic of Germany (Dr Wittchen).

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49(8):630-636. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820080038006
Abstract

• A test-retest reliability study of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R was conducted on 592 subjects in four patient and two nonpatient sites in this country as well as one patient site in Germany. For most of the major categories, ks for current and lifetime diagnoses in the patient samples were above.60, with an overall weighted k of.61 for current and.68 for lifetime diagnoses. For the nonpatients, however, agreement was considerably lower, with a mean k of.37 for current and.51 for lifetime diagnoses. These values for the patient and nonpatient samples are roughly comparable to those obtained with other structured diagnostic instruments. Sources of diagnostic disagreement, such as inadequate training of interviewers, information variance, and low base rates for many disorders, are discussed.

×