[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.119.60. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1995

Diagnosis, Assessment, and Individual Complexity

Author Affiliations

Health Sciences Center University of Colorado 4200 E Ninth Ave Denver, CO 80262

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52(8):637-638. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950200027005
Abstract

The CLINICIAN'S diagnostic process involves both the identification and classification of the disorder and the assessment of individual functioning. Both aspects are important for planning treatment and for evaluating outcomes. The multiaxial system of diagnosing mental disorders has arisen in recognition of the need for a standardized system of classification for communication among professionals. Hence, the classifications in DSM-IV (axes 1 through 3) are supplemented by the assessment of an individual's life stressors and functioning (axes 4 and 5).1 Axes 4 and 5, however, are wanting. Criteria for judgments are less specific than for the first three axes, and axes 4 and 5 occupy little attention in our manuals and do not take account of individual complexity.

See also pages 625, 633, 639, 642, 645, 646, 649, 651, and 654

The article by Horowitz and colleagues2 presents a method to bolster our systematic assessment of individual functioning. It

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×