[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.216.242. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1995

Role-Relationship ModelsAre They Useful for Research and Practice?

Author Affiliations

Department of Psychology University of California—Berkeley 3210 Tolman Hall, No. 1650 Berkely, CA 94720-1650

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52(8):646-648. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950200036009
Abstract

CLINICAL theories, psychological formulations of patients, and inferences about their mental processes, until recently, could be evaluated only informally. Such assessments necessarily relied largely on clinical understanding and experience. Important strides are now being made in the formidable task of testing, in scientifically acceptable ways, inferences and assumptions that are made routinely in clinical practice about patients' mental processes. The method of Horowitz and his colleagues1 for generating psychological formulations that are reliable and replicable is an important exemplar of this development. Alternative approaches to this problem include, among others, the Core Conflictual Relationship Theme,2 the Plan Formulation Method,3 the Structural Analysis of Social Behavior,4 and Fundamental Repetitive and Maladaptive Emotion Structures.5 All of these approaches apply an organizing framework for specific constructs and capture repetitive structures of motivation, cognition, emotion, or interpersonal transactions.

See also pages 625, 633, 637, 639, 642, 645, 649, 651,

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×