[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.159.129.152. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 1995

Personality: Psychodynamic Perspectives

Author Affiliations

Department of Psychiatry Cornell University Medical College 525 E 68th St, Box 147 New York, NY 10021

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52(8):651-653. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950200041011
Abstract

THE PERSONALITY disorder literature bulges with arguments concerning the aptness of the dimensional or the categorical view as a basis for classification.1 Now Horowitz and his team2 ask yet another question that goes beyond the issue of discriminant validity in personality taxonomy, raising the issue of the usefulness of our current classification for intervention. Other matters are also considered in their criticism, such as the idea that static personality profiles do not account for the multiple reaction patterns that may arise in any one person with a so-called personality disorder. They reintroduce the role-relationship model (RRM), about which Horowitz3 has written so eloquently before, and acknowledge his debt to the core conflictual relationship theme (CCRT) of Luborsky et al.4 This report is not a fully original contribution, but rather a summary of new and prior reliability and validity studies that recommend the scientific claim of the

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×