[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 23.23.54.109. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
November 1995

Antisocial Behavior

Author Affiliations

Intramural Research Program National Institute of Mental Health 10 Center Dr, MSC 1274 Bethesda, MD 20892-1274

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52(11):900-901. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950230014004
Abstract

The Modern debate on the causes of human behavioral differences goes back to the last century, when Francis Galton originated the phrase "nature vs nurture." He came down solidly on the side of "nature" as he understood it, which in retrospect is most unfortunate since he was acting on prejudice rather than evidence, and went on to be a proponent of eugenics and racism.1 Today, a generation after the Nazi mass murders with a pseudoscientific justification based on inherited "nature," it is understandable that genetics of behavior is not an acceptable variable in American political and social discourse.

Yet there is evidence for genetic factors in behavior, including mental illnesses and antisocial behavior, and it is timely that this evidence be examined and made use of by behavioral scientists. For antisocial behavior, adoption and twin studies since the 1970s have consistently implied a genetic factor, as reviewed elsewhere.2

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×