[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
February 1997

Sex Differences in Schizophrenia

Author Affiliations

The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Division of Psychiatric Neuroimaging Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences 600 N Wolfe St Meyer 3-166 Baltimore, MD 21287-7362

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54(2):189. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830140101019

Sex differences in schizophrenia, including variation in clinical symptoms, onset age, risk factors, response to treatment, and putative biological risk markers, are widely recognized to exist, yet are hard to explain by any pathogenetic mechanism.1,2 In his discussion of Olney and Farber's N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor hypothesis, Crow3 compares various (eg, neurohumoral, anatomical, physiological) theories of the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. He further examines these theories for their ability to explain various known features of the disorder, eg, clinical symptoms, brain changes, and epidemiological characteristics. Among these epidemiological features, he includes the sex differences discussed earlier. He recognizes only 2 hypotheses, the corpus callosum change model and the abnormal language lateralization model, as being able to account successfully for sex differences in schizophrenia.

Of the theories he compares, Crow expresses the opinion that the heteromodal association cortex model only "doubtfully explains" such sex differences. We be lieve that in fact

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview