Figure 1. All cases and controls (CTRL) with copy gains (blue) or losses (red) near the BDNF locus. Megabase marks (Mb) represent human genome reference 18 build coordinates. Green shading represents an identified critical region while darker green shading corresponds specifically to the genomic location of BDNF.
Figure 2. An approximately 2.5-megabase deletion in subject 2, including BDNF. Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization results demonstrating a deletion on chromosome 11. Gray shading represents the predicted size of the deletion, while individual probes from the array are represented by black, white, or red dots. White probes represent decreased probe intensity from DNA from subject 2, reflecting copy loss. Human genome reference 18 build coordinates are shown on the x-axis.
Figure 3. Positive correlation of body mass index (BMI) (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) with age in subjects with a BDNF deletion.
Ernst C, Marshall CR, Shen Y, et al. Highly penetrant alterations of a critical region including BDNF in human psychopathology and obesity. Arch Gen Psychiatry.. Published online October 8, 2012. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.660.
eFigure. Subject 1 is becoming more overweight over time compared to the average weight for people his age.
Ernst C, Marshall CR, Shen Y, Metcalfe K, Rosenfeld J, Hodge JC, Torres A, Blumenthal I, Chiang C, Pillalamarri V, Crapper L, Diallo AB, Ruderfer D, Pereira S, Sklar P, Purcell S, Wildin RS, Spencer AC, Quade BF, Harris DJ, Lemyre E, Wu B, Stavropoulos DJ, Geraghty MT, Shaffer LG, Morton CC, Scherer SW, Gusella JF, Talkowski ME. Highly Penetrant Alterations of a Critical Region Including BDNF in Human Psychopathology and Obesity. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(12):1238-1246. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.660
Author Affiliations: Department of Psychiatry, McGill University (Drs Ernst and Diallo and Mr Crapper), and St Justine Hospital (Dr Lemyre), Montreal, Quebec, Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children (Drs Marshall and Scherer), and Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology (Dr Stavropoulos) and Molecular Genetics (Dr Scherer) and McLaughlin Centre (Dr Scherer), University of Toronto, Toronto, and Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa (Mr Geraghty), Ontario, Canada; Center for Human Genetic Research, Massachusetts General Hospital (Drs Ernst, Shen, Sklar, Purcell, Gusella, and Talkowski and Messrs Blumenthal, Chiang, Pillalamarri, and Ruderfer), Departments of Neurology (Drs Ernst, Gusella, and Talkowski), Pathology (Dr Morton), and Genetics (Dr Gusella), Harvard Medical School, Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (Drs Shen, Harris, and Wu) and Pediatrics (Dr Torres), and Division of Clinical Genetics (Dr Harris), Boston Children's Hospital, Departments of Pathology (Drs Quade and Morton) and Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology (Ms Pereira and Drs Quade and Morton), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, and Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge (Drs Ernst, Morton, Gusella, and Talkowski); Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine (Dr Shen), and Children's Hospital and Institutes of Biomedical Science, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University (Dr Wu), Shanghai, China; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, England (Dr Metcalfe); Signature Genomic Laboratories, PerkinElmer Inc, Spokane, Washington (Drs Rosenfeld and Shaffer); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Dr Hodge); Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York (Dr Sklar); and Idaho State Genetic Services Program and St Luke's Children's Hospital, Boise (Dr Wildin), and Department of Philosophy and Religion, College of Idaho, Caldwell (Ms Spencer).
Context Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is suspected of being a causative factor in psychiatric disorders based on case reports or studies involving large structural anomalies.
Objective To determine the involvement of BDNF in human psychopathology.
Design Case-control study.
Setting Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization data from 7 molecular diagnostic centers including 38 550 affected subjects and 28 705 unaffected subjects.
Patients Subjects referred to diagnostic screening centers for microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for physical or cognitive impairment.
Main Outcome Measures Genomic copy number gains and losses.
Results We report 5 individuals with psychopathology and genomic deletion of a critical region including BDNF. The defined critical region was never disrupted in control subjects or diagnostic cases without developmental abnormalities.
Conclusion Hemizygosity of the BDNF region contributes to variable psychiatric phenotypes including anxiety, behavioral, and mood disorders.
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a nervous system growth factor that plays a critical role in synaptic modeling, neurodevelopment, and cell signaling.1 It is a member of the nerve growth factor family with structural similarity to nerve growth factor and neurotrophin 3 and neurotrophin 4 and structural differences distinct from the other nervous system growth factor families, which include fibroblast growth factor, insulin-like growth factor, transforming growth factor β, and cytokine families.2 While all nervous system growth factors support neurodevelopment, BDNF has been singularly implicated for its role in obesity, pain, and memory.3- 7 The protein is encoded by BDNF, located on the short arm of chromosome 11 at band p14, where a polymorphic variant at codon 66 specifies either valine or methionine and is thought to affect processing of proBDNF to BDNF. This locus has been considered as a risk factor for schizophrenia, major depression, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder, and many other psychopathologies,8,9 primarily from association-based studies evaluating the nonsynonymous Val66Met variant and studies comprising cases with deletions on 11p associated with deletions in WT1 and PAX6.10,11
BDNF sequencing studies in psychiatry and genomic copy loss studies support a link between BDNF with behavior and obesity. WAGR syndrome, a deletion syndrome of the short arm of chromosome 11 associated with Wilms tumor, aniridia, genitourinary anomalies, and mental retardation in which deletions include PAX6 and WT1, sometimes includes larger deletions extending to BDNF. Two recent studies associated subjects with WAGR syndrome with deletions extending to BDNF with obesity, bipolar disorder, or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.10,11 In support of a psychiatric phenotype due to copy loss at the BDNF locus, 2 independent case reports (3 subjects in total) described obese patients who presented with complex neurobehavioral phenotypes.12,13 Further, a deep resequencing study of BDNF exons and flanking regions from subjects with major depression and controls revealed several novel variants associated with major depression, suggesting that genetic variation in BDNF may have an impact on mood.14
Molecular studies in rodents have supported a role for Bdnf in behavior, in particular through the finding that defective neuronal release of BDNF by in vivo knockdown leads to increased anxiety-like traits in mice,15,16 and while heterozygous Bdnf knockout mice do not display anxiety traits,17 they are reported to be more aggressive and hyperphagic than wild-type mice.18Bdnf has also been shown to have a key role in mediating social defeat stress in rodents19; in particular, it is required for the development of experience-dependent social aversion.15 With respect to sensory systems, homozygous Bdnf knockout mice show sensory deficits with decreased survival of sensory ganglia while sparing motor neuron development,20,21 in line with data from human patients with WAGR syndrome with a BDNF deletion that suggest a deficit in nociception.11 Together, data from rodents suggest that whole-organism deletion of Bdnf leads to behavioral, sensory, and weight alterations, while deletion of Bdnf specifically in brain areas associated with behavior leads to anxiety and aggression.
In view of the large number of association studies with suggestive evidence for BDNF polymorphisms in psychopathology, case reports describing large genomic alterations involving BDNF in subjects with psychiatric symptoms, and extensive phenotyping in animal models, we sought to better resolve the relationship between BDNF and psychopathology by identifying subjects with genomic copy number changes that include BDNF.
Table 1 summarizes all subjects used in this study. From Signature Genomics (SG), we analyzed a total of 26 144 probands studied using oligonucleotide-based whole-genome array comparative genomic hybridization, using either a 105K-feature platform (SignatureChip OS version 1.0; custom-designed by SG, manufactured by Agilent Technologies) or a 135K-feature platform (SignatureChip OS version 2.0; custom-designed by SG, manufactured by Roche NimbleGen), according to previously described methods.24,25 From this initial cohort, we divided subjects into those referred with an indication of a neurodevelopmental disorder (n = 14 616) and those referred with an indication for study that did not involve a known neurodevelopmental abnormality (n = 11 528). Unlike the microarrays used to analyze controls, these specific SG platforms are incapable of detecting intragenic BNDF variations and are limited to whole-gene BDNF deletions at a resolution of approximately 270 kb and 120 kb, respectively. The ethnic distribution in the samples from SG was estimated from a sampling cross-section previously described.22 This sample (n = 144 subjects, self-reported) was composed of 75% white individuals, 7% African American individuals, and 18% individuals of other race/ethnicity. The sex distribution was 59% male and 41% female. The only alterations spanning BDNF observed in the SG group were patients with WAGR syndrome (n = 2), so there was no contribution to these analyses from this data set, although they are included in all statistical analyses. The ethnicity of each patient described herein with a copy gain or loss of BDNF was white.
The clinical cytogenetics laboratory at The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, screened patients using either Agilent 4x44K array26 or the 4x180K ISCA v2 microarray manufactured by Agilent and designed by Oxford Gene Technologies. Previously published copy number variant data from 11 509 controls genotyped with high-resolution single-nucleotide polymorphism microarrays were compiled from several subject groups including 1234 Affymetrix 6.0 controls from Ottawa, Ontario,27 1123 Affymetrix 6.0 controls from PopGen,27,28 4783 Affymetrix 6.0 controls from the Wellcome Trust Case-Control Consortium,29 1056 Affymetrix 6.0 controls from the International HapMap 3 Consortium,30 1287 Illumina 1M data from Study of Addiction: Genetics and Environment controls,31 and 2026 Hap550k controls.23
From the Developmental Genome Anatomy Project (DGAP) database (www.dgap.harvard.edu), we had access to information on 221 subjects, all of whom had a balanced chromosomal rearrangement. Identification of BDNF hemizygosity in 1 of these subjects (DGAP173) was assessed by an Agilent G3 1M array. Based on the available karyotype information of t(2;11)(q11.2;p13), this deletion appears to be independent of the chromosomal rearrangement but we cannot rule out a more complex rearrangement involving both regions. Array processing for all other clinical diagnostic centers was done using commercially available Agilent 244K arrays, except for the Mayo Clinic, which used 180K Agilent arrays.
Control individuals were obtained from a variety of sources listed earlier as well as control data from the International Schizophrenia Consortium32 and the Database of Genomic Variants33 (filtered for overlap with other studies) and those described and publicly available from Cooper and colleagues,22 filtering Wellcome Trust Case-Control Consortium controls to avoid redundancy with the previously mentioned control set. Table 1 describes these control subjects in more detail. All genomic coordinate positions are with reference to the human genome reference 18. Statistical analyses were performed using the Fisher exact test in the statistical package R.
Clinical diagnoses from all patients were performed by independent, qualified physicians who had seen the patient over a period of at least 2 years. We defined obesity as body mass index (BMI) (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) more than 30 or if it was specifically indicated by the primary caregiver. We defined overweight as a BMI more than 25. Psychiatric diagnoses were done using DSM-IV criteria by caregiver interviews with affected subjects. In all BDNF deletion cases, referring physicians were contacted and provided clinical information for all subjects, allowing for psychiatric phenotyping.
These studies were approved by the institutional review boards of our institutions, and caregivers for each subject gave informed consent when needed.
We screened microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization data for more than 38 000 subjects from clinical diagnostic centers at Boston Children's Hospital; The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St Justine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and SG for any subjects with copy number changes of the BDNF region (see Table 1 for complete description of all subject groups). We identified 5 subjects with deletions encompassing the entire BDNF gene and 1 subject with a duplication spanning BDNF (Figure 1 and Table 2). For all subjects, microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization was used to initially identify BDNF copy changes and Figure 2 shows a visual example of microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization data in subject 2 from this study. The deletion group displayed varied phenotypes that included neurodevelopmental, behavioral, and mood disorders, in addition to being obese or overweight and insensitive to pain in some cases, as summarized in Table 2 and presented in greater detail later. The subject with a duplication also presented with developmental delay and dystonia, but no further information was available. Additional subjects identified with WAGR syndrome were excluded from this analysis (n = 2 subjects from SG) because of the very large number of genes in WAGR deletions, the severity of the associated neurodevelopmental phenotype,35 and the inability to obtain any follow-up information on these subjects.
Subject 1 was identified with a BDNF deletion at chr11:22,858,513-29,066,320 and a small deletion at chr19:61,453,936-61,530,271 intersecting the testes-specific gene ZSCAN5A. The 10-year-old boy had been diagnosed with pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, anxiety, behavioral issues (eg, constantly hitting head against the wall), and mood dysregulation. At 4 years of age, his condition regressed markedly, and to date, he has been treated with escitalopram oxalate (Lexapro), aripiprazole (Abilify), citalopram hydrobromide (Celexa), guanfacine hydrochloride (Tenex), methylphenidate hydrochloride (Ritalin), atomoxetine hydrochloride (Strattera), and clonidine hydrochloride. His height and weight at age 9 years were 138.7 cm and 43.5 kg (95th-97th percentile), respectively, with a BMI of 22.6 (see the eFigure for a weight chart for this subject taken at different points showing a progression toward obesity). He was extremely aggressive and parental report noted that the subject does not complain of pain when accidents occur. Array results were confirmed using clinically available multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification probes targeting BDNF (SALSA MLPA P219; MRC-Holland).
Subject 2 (DGAP173) was a 21-year-old woman with a karyotype of 46,XX,t(2;11)(q11.2;p13) who also had a 2.5-megabase deletion (chr11:27,050,622-29,550,113) on chromosome 11 that included BDNF (Figure 2). Array comparative genomic hybridization results were confirmed using clinically available multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification probes targeting BDNF. She had mild developmental delay (combined language and motor delay), major depression, generalized anxiety, sleep disturbance (sleep apnea), self-injurious behaviors, agitation, and tantrums. In 2009, at age 19 years, she weighed 167.6 kg and had a height of 180.1 cm, with a BMI of 51.7. Her head circumference was 61 cm, which is outside of the normal adult range of 55 to 58 cm. She had male-pattern hirsutism (thought to be associated with a tentative diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome, maternally inherited) and had had only a single period with no further menstruation even with trials of oral contraceptive pills. Impaired glucose tolerance without evidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, poor lipid profile with elevated triglyceride and total cholesterol and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, elevated testosterone level, some deepening of the voice, and history of 1 nonfebrile seizure at 2 years of age were also noted. Her skin was remarkable for eczema, moles, and skin tags. She had dysmorphic features including bilateral epicanthal folds giving a saddle appearance to the nasal bridge, a small nose, and complex malocclusion with upper teeth more narrow and frontal than lower. Morphologically, she had somewhat short hands, slightly hyperkeratotic and sweaty palms, fifth-finger brachydactyly and clinodactyly, minor extension limitation of the right elbow, hypoplastic toenails, short feet, and copper-colored verrucous lesions in intertriginous regions (acanthosis nigricans vs epidermal nevi) present on the back, chest, and neck.
Subject 3 was identified with a maternally inherited deletion at chr11:23,484,198-27,857,928. He was referred for investigation at 2 years 9 months of age for severe receptive and expressive speech delay. He had impaired social, play, and behavioral skills as well as global developmental delay and a duplex left kidney. He was a large child with weight of 29.3 kg, height of 103.5 cm, and BMI of 27.4, all of which are greater than the 97th percentile. His head circumference was 52 cm, which is considered within the normal range at age 2.75 years but is at the 94th percentile. Family history is of note in that his mother had intellectual difficulties. Her height was 171 cm; weight, 114.3 kg; and BMI, 39.5. No further information was available for her. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis confirmed she had the same deletion. Maternal grandparents were of normal intellect and growth, and fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses were normal.
Subject 4 was a 16-year-old boy whose 36-week gestation was notable for the umbilical cord being wrapped around his neck. A 180K Agilent microarray screen revealed a chr11:23,002,186-27,956,720 (human genome reference 18) de novo deletion. He had hypercholesterolemia, a fatty liver, and hypertension and was prediabetic. At an assessment done at age 16 years, he was 151 kg and 1.73 m and had a BMI of 50.5. He had speech delay, pervasive developmental disorder, and an IQ/DQ of 58. With respect to psychopathology, he had been diagnosed with an adjustment disorder (mixed disturbance of emotion and conduct), depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed the array results using RP11-1150I2.
Subject 5 was a boy with a disruption in BDNF (chr11:25,649,116-31,566,599). No other genetic anomalies were detected in this subject, initially ascertained through learning difficulties, severe speech and language delay, and obesity (BMI 28.3 at age 5 years 10 months; >97th percentile). He had a statement of special educational need, and at age 4.5 years, his overall general conceptual ability was limited (score on the British Ability Scales II was 47 [<0.4 percentile] in keeping with a severe learning disability); he was reported to be able to write his name at 6 years of age. He had poor fine motor skills and poor problem-solving skills. With respect to sensory systems, he had hyperacusis and a high pain threshold. He was described as having inappropriate toddlerlike tantrums triggered by not getting his own way or not being able to eat when he wishes. He had sleeping difficulties and was taking melatonin. A strengths-and-difficulties questionnaire completed by his teacher at age 5 years noted very high scores for overall stress, hyperactivity, and attentional difficulties and high scores for difficulties getting along with other children.
Subject 6 had a BDNF duplication and was indicated for screening because of developmental delay and dystonia (chr11:27,179,904-28,837,666). No further information was available on this subject.
There was a notable relationship between age and BMI in subjects with a BDNF deletion, strongly supporting a role for a deletion in this region and obesity. Specifically, while all subjects were overweight at a young age, older subjects had even higher BMIs, suggesting a progression toward increasing obesity (BMI vs age, Pearson = 0.86; P = .06), with a particular increase after the later teen years (Figure 3). We were able to further support the hypothesis that people with a BDNF deletion have increased BMIs over time by acquiring data from a single subject (subject 1) who received multiple assessments over time. The supporting eFigure shows the increase in BMI over time compared with age standards.
While each of the BDNF -containing deletions reported herein disrupted multiple genes, the critical region of overlap included only BBOX1, CCDC34, LGR4, BDNF, and LIN7C (Figure 1). We therefore attempted to narrow the critical region responsible for the mood and behavior phenotypes by examining structural variations in data sets from individuals without a comparable phenotype. We found no structural variations affecting BDNF in copy number variant data from 28 705 control individuals with high-resolution chromosomal microarrays (Figure 1 and Table 1), despite the superior resolution of these platforms relative to those used to analyze most of the cases. There was also no disruption of the BDNF locus from clinical diagnostic cases not reported to have a neurological abnormality (n = 11 528) assayed through the SG Genoglyphix Chromosome Aberration Database. Collectively, though disruption of this locus was rare, we found a nominally significant burden of dosage alterations spanning BDNF in cases compared with all controls (Fisher exact test, P = .04) as well as the combination of controls and clinical diagnostic cases without a neurodevelopmental abnormality (n = 40 233; P = .01). Similar results were obtained if we restricted analyses to only those cases with deletion of the locus (P = .08 and .03, respectively). There was evidence for deletion of BBOX1, as well as for duplication of BBOX1, CCDC34, and LGR4, though there were no disruptions of LIN7C. CCDC34 has previously been reported as disrupted in a case of translocation36 without an associated neurodevelopmental phenotype. Taken together, these findings indicate that deletions encompassing BDNF are rare, but when they occur, they are highly penetrant in producing a distinct phenotypic spectrum that includes behavioral/psychiatric traits due to alterations in BDNF, LIN7C, LGR4, or some combination of these genes.
To our knowledge, this study represents the largest and highest genomic resolution study to date investigating the role of BDNF in psychopathology. Previous reports identified single cases with large deletions encompassing BDNF or cases with BDNF deletions and WAGR syndrome, where 1 study identified 4 different subjects with WAGR syndrome with behavioral disturbances.10 The current study included more than 38 000 probands collected internationally and found 5 subjects with BDNF deletions with heterogeneous, but always psychiatric, phenotypes. Despite being the most extensive study to date of the role of BDNF in psychopathology, this study should be considered supportive of the role of BDNF in psychopathology and not unequivocal, because the critical region included 2 other potentially causative genes affected in all BDNF deletion cases. Nonetheless, animal data and analysis of the function of these 2 genes in the critical region strongly suggest that BDNF hemizygosity leads to psychopathology.
Mouse studies of LGR4 and LIN7C orthologs suggest a less central role for these genes in behavior. Lgr4 knockout mice show embryonic lethality, thought to be due to its fundamental role in organogenesis, particularly of the kidney and the sex organs.37,38 Subject 3 in our study had a duplex left kidney and subject 2 had polycystic ovary syndrome. Notably, expression of Lgr4 is largely absent from the brain except in the olfactory bulb and periventricular area; expression is highest in the kidney, gallbladder, heart, bone, and spinal cord.39 Thus, LGR4 hemizygosity is unlikely to contribute to psychopathology in humans but could account for other observed abnormalities. Lin7c (aka MALS-3) has a role in maintaining cell polarity during development in the mouse,40 though 2 paralogs, Lin7a and Lin7b, are suspected of being able to compensate for Lin7c deficiency.41 Distribution of Lin7c expression in the mouse brain is low compared with Lin7a and Lin7b and is restricted to the dentate gyrus, cerebellum, and superior colliculus. In contrast, Lin7a and Lin7b are abundantly expressed in other brain regions, especially the cortex and dentate gyrus.41 While this expression pattern does not suggest a primary role for LIN7C hemizygosity in psychopathology, such a contribution, alone or in interaction with BDNF, cannot be excluded.
The presence of psychiatric manifestations in subjects with BDNF- associated deletion is consistent with previously reported cases, as delineated in Table 2, along with their associated neurodevelopmental and behavioral phenotypes. Taken together, this collection of subjects supports the conclusion that gross disruption of BDNF in humans is associated with psychopathology, being obese or overweight, and, at least sometimes, pain insensitivity—phenotypes consistent with data from manipulation of Bdnf in rodents. No information was available for 3 deletion subjects with respect to pain insensitivity (1 of the subjects with a BDNF deletion was reported to engage in self-injurious behavior, a phenotype frequently associated with pain insensitivity in individuals with intellectual disability42), so we cannot draw a conclusion concerning the universality of pain insensitivity, but follow-up studies are warranted. Both the overweight/obese and nociceptive phenotypes in humans are also supported by a study of patients with WAGR syndrome, while those with deletions that extended to BDNF were more likely to be obese and insensitive to pain11 than those without a BDNF deletion.
The consensus phenotype for individuals with a deletion in BDNF suggests that young children are hyperactive and anxious and have an intolerance to change. As subjects age, they likely develop more pronounced anxiety and mood disorders, exemplified by the 16-year-old and 21-year-old subjects with major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder and by a 25-year-old woman with mood disturbances from a previous report.12 Identification of a single locus that may be linked to major depression or anxiety highlights the heterogeneity of these psychiatric diseases—most subjects with major depression do not have deletions in BDNF, for example—and the need to possibly reassess how clinical categorization proceeds.43
Chromosomal aberrations at genomic loci that associate with mental retardation are common, but hemizygosity of a locus that can affect a spectrum of phenotypes including mood is less common, and the mechanisms that could contribute to such phenotypic diversity remain to be elucidated. Deeper investigation of the regulation of BDNF and of the molecular actions of the transcribed product will be required to better understand how hemizygosity at this locus contributes to psychopathology.
Correspondence: Carl Ernst, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University and Douglas Hospital, 6875 LaSalle Blvd, Frank Common Bldg, Room 2101.2, Verdun, QC H4H 1R3, Canada (email@example.com) and Michael E. Talkowski, PhD, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Center for Human Genetic Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge St, Boston, MA 02114 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Submitted for Publication: January 25, 2012; final revision received March 26, 2012; accepted April 26, 2012.
Published Online: October 8, 2012. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.660
Financial Disclosure: Drs Rosenfeld and Shaffer are employees of Signature Genomic Laboratories, PerkinElmer Inc.
Funding/Support: This work was funded by a Canada Research Chair in Psychiatric Genetics from the Canadian Institute of Health Research (Dr Ernst), grants GM061354 (Drs Morton and Gusella), HD065286 (Dr Gusella), and MH095687 (Dr Talkowski) from the National Institutes of Health, the Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (Drs Gusella and Talkowski), grant 2010CB529601 from the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (Dr Wu), and grants 09JC1402400 and 09ZR1404500 from the Science and Technology Council of Shanghai (Dr Wu).
Additional Contributions: We are grateful to the members of the International Schizophrenia Consortium and Wellcome Trust Case-Control Consortium, Evan Eichler, PhD, and Bradley Coe, PhD, for their invaluable contribution of control resources. We are deeply thankful to all patients, families, and referring physicians who participated in this study.