Pine DS, Klein RG, Roberson-Nay R, Mannuzza S, Moulton JL, Woldehawariat G, Guardino M. Response to 5% Carbon Dioxide in Children and AdolescentsRelationship to Panic Disorder in Parents and Anxiety Disorders in Subjects. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(1):73-80. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.1.73
Copyright 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.2005
Carbon dioxide (CO2) sensitivity is postulated to be a familial risk marker of panic disorder (PD). Exaggerated responses to CO2 inhalation have been reported in adults with PD and their unaffected adult relatives, as well as in clinic-referred children with anxiety disorders.
To test in a family-based design whether CO2 hypersensitivity is a familial risk marker for PD and associated with current anxiety disorders in children and adolescents.
Setting and Participants
One hundred forty-two offspring (aged 9-19 years) of parents with PD, major depressive disorder, or no disorder. Forty-five (32%) had a current anxiety disorder, excluding specific phobia.
Design and Main Outcome Measures
Parents and offspring received diagnostic assessments. Offspring underwent 5% CO2 inhalation at home. Panic symptoms and panic attacks were rated with the Acute Panic Inventory at baseline, while anticipating CO2 delivery (“threat”), and during CO2 inhalation. Respiratory rate and volume were measured with spirometry.
No group differences were found in Acute Panic Inventory ratings at baseline or in respiratory measures during threat. Risk for PD was not associated with CO2 sensitivity (panic symptoms and respiratory physiologic response). During CO2 inhalation, offspring with anxiety disorders, relative to offspring without anxiety disorders, experienced significantly more panic symptoms and panic attacks, as well as elevated respiratory rates. During threat, panic symptoms were significantly and independently associated with both parental PD and offspring anxiety disorders.
No support was obtained for CO2 hypersensitivity as a familial risk marker for PD in children and adolescents. Links between childhood anxiety disorders and CO2 sensitivity were replicated. Familial risk for PD in children and adolescents may be associated with vulnerability to anticipatory anxiety.
A link between panic disorder (PD) and heightened responses to carbon dioxide (CO2) inhalation is well documented.1- 4 Carbon dioxide–enriched air is more likely to provoke panic symptoms and panic attacks as well as an elevated respiratory rate in patients with PD, compared with other disorders.5- 10 Enhanced CO2-induced anxiety also has been found in psychiatrically healthy, first-degree adult relatives of patients with PD, leading to the hypothesis that CO2 hypersensitivity is a familial vulnerability marker for PD.11- 14 Panic disorder usually develops in adulthood.15 As a result, studies in psychiatrically healthy adult relatives focus on individuals who have passed through the risk period, excluding those who develop the disorder. Therefore, results from such studies may not be fully informative on the significance of premorbid risk markers. In contrast, juvenile offspring of parents with PD are still at risk for PD and thus provide an informative means for assessing premorbid vulnerability. To our knowledge, no study has reported on CO2 sensitivity in young offspring of parents with PD.
To investigate biological links between anxiety disorders in children and PD in adults, we previously measured CO2 hypersensitivity in children.16- 18 We found that children with anxiety disorders showed greater CO2 sensitivity than psychiatrically healthy children, confirming similar vulnerability in adults with PD. However, children in these reports were all clinical cases, and studies of nonreferred children are lacking. This family-based study examined whether findings obtained among clinic cases apply to affected nonreferred children. Extension of these findings would confirm the relevance of CO2 sensitivity in early anxiety disorders, fostering research on mechanisms in childhood anxiety disorders.
The current study addresses 2 questions: whether CO2 sensitivity is greater (1) in offspring at high risk for PD compared with offspring at low risk (ie, whether it is a familial risk marker for PD in children) and (2) in offspring with a current anxiety disorder compared with offspring without an anxiety disorder. First, the study tests the hypothesis that the offspring of parents with PD will exhibit during CO2 exposure elevated panic symptoms, elevated frequency of panic attacks, and elevated respiratory rate. Specifically, we hypothesized that, relative to responses in offspring of psychiatrically healthy parents, CO2-related responses would be perturbed in offspring of parents with PD but not in offspring of parents with only major depressive disorder (MDD). We included children of parents with MDD to determine whether correlates of parental PD relate to parental PD specifically rather than parental psychopathology in general. Second, we predicted that offspring with ongoing anxiety disorders (except specific phobia) would show CO2 hypersensitivity compared with offspring without anxiety disorder. We also examined panic symptoms and respiratory physiologic response immediately before CO2 exposure (anticipation/threat). Based on prior findings,16,18 elevated panic symptoms were expected in offspring of parents with PD, as well as in those with an anxiety disorder.
Subjects consisted of 142 offspring, aged 9 to 19 years, of parents with PD, MDD, and no mental disorder. Exclusion criteria included history of psychosis, mania, pervasive developmental disorder, current use of psychotropic medication, IQ less than 70, medical conditions that could affect CO2 response, and residence outside the New York City, NY, metropolitan area. Medical record reviews at outpatient clinics identified parents with PD and/or MDD. Comparison parents were identified from a pediatric dental clinic or using acquaintance methods described elsewhere.19 Approximately half of comparison parents were recruited from each source. Except for diagnostic status, inclusion/exclusion criteria were identical for probands and comparisons.
Parents were drawn from cohorts identified in earlier studies. Data were collected as part of a 2-hour session. The current study included assessments of memory and a physical examination, as well as exposure to facial photographs depicting various emotions; the session ended with the CO2-inhalation procedure. Informed consent/assent was provided by all participants. Subjects were told that the assessment would involve periods of room-air and CO2 breathing that might induce anxiety. This information was relayed at the time of consent, at the initiation of the in-home assessment, and immediately before the procedure. Although conveying this information 3 times might enhance anticipatory anxiety, it is typically done18 for families to be fully cognizant of risks of anxiety induction during CO2 exposure.
From 290 families with 497 children identified from previous studies, 220 children met study criteria, but 78 (35%) declined participation because of reservations about the CO2 procedure. All 78 declined when first informed about the potential for anxiety induction; none did so subsequently. This report is based on 142 offspring from 93 families. Offspring who participated in CO2 inhalation did not differ from those who declined participation in terms of age, sex, ethnicity, social class, or parental or child psychiatric diagnosis.
Parents were administered the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R20 by trained psychologists blind to offspring mental status. Parents were interviewed individually when both parents were available. Interviewers wrote clinical narrative summaries documenting the lifetime DSM-IV diagnoses formulated. Fidelity of the interview was monitored through expert review of narratives. Offspring born to at least 1 parent with PD were considered at high risk; low risk was defined as absence of PD in both parents.11- 13 Comorbidity in familial risk was also based on diagnoses in either parent. Thus, an offspring at risk for both PD and MDD might have 1 parent with both disorders or 1 parent with PD and another with MDD. Of 40 such offspring, 37 were born to a parent with both conditions. None of 24 offspring born to parents with only PD had 2 affected parents; 22 of 52 offspring born to parents with only MDD had 2 affected parents.
Offspring diagnosis relied on parent and self-reports. In the month before CO2 inhalation, parents and offspring were interviewed in their home. Trained psychologists blind to parent diagnoses administered the Parent As Respondent Informant Schedule21 to parents and a child version to offspring. Different staff conducted parent and offspring interviews, as in our prior family studies.21,22 Fidelity of the interview was monitored through audiotapes. Clinicians wrote clinical narrative summaries documenting DSM-IV diagnoses; these were blindly reviewed by an expert clinician for accuracy. A review by 2 raters of randomly selected parent and child interviews (50 from each group) yielded acceptable reliability for anxiety and mood disorders (κ>0.65). Diagnoses were considered present if either the parent or the child report justified a diagnosis.
The decision to conduct CO2 inhalation in the home resulted from experiences in a prior community-based CO2 study, where many families were willing to participate only in their home.16 The procedure was supervised by a physician and technician blind to all psychiatric data. Testing occurred in a room selected by the family, using procedures adapted from those described previously.11,16,17 The current study used a portable apparatus developed for an initial study of adult PD.11 The procedure involved breathing through a face mask for 25 minutes. Room air initially was delivered for 10 minutes, followed by 15 minutes of 5% CO2. Respiration was monitored throughout the process using spirometry. Subjects were told that CO2 exposure could begin at any point.
As in prior studies,1,16 CO2 hypersensitivity was quantified through subjective reports of panic symptoms rated on the Acute Panic Inventory (API), which has been validated in pediatric anxiety disorders.16- 18 It inquires about 23 symptoms that subjects rate as absent (0), mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3). The API generates a total score (possible range, 0-69) that has served as the dependent measure in previous studies. Ratings were obtained at 4 points. The first occurred before placement of the face mask, before respiratory monitoring began; the second, after subjects had been fitted with the face mask and had been breathing room air for 10 minutes; the third API rating was obtained after 5 minutes of CO2 exposure or before the 5 minutes had elapsed if subjects asked that CO2 inhalation be discontinued; the fourth was after 15 minutes of CO2 exposure or at any time during the last 10 minutes if subjects requested that CO2 inhalation be discontinued. Fourteen subjects asked to discontinue the CO2 procedure during the initial 5 minutes; therefore, they only have data for the third but not the fourth rating. Because it is important to examine CO2 sensitivity in subjects who discontinue the procedure, analyses of CO2 sensitivity rely on the third API rating. An additional 10 subjects asked to stop the procedure after 5 minutes. Before the study, the technician was trained to rate panic attacks, based on the API ratings. As in prior studies,6,16 panic attacks required an increase in self-rated anxiety and increases of 1 point or more on at least 4 API symptoms.
Measures of respiration used spirometry methods described in Coryell et al.11 They involved a continuous recording of breath-by-breath values for respiratory rate and tidal volume, as well as their product (ie, minute ventilation). These data were preprocessed for statistical analyses, involving procedures described previously.16 Specifically, average values were calculated for the entire 10-minute baseline period and for each of the first 10 30-second periods of the first 5 minutes of CO2 exposure. Analyses rely on 30-second means, but for ease of data perusal, we present means per minute of CO2 exposure. Risk-group differences were hypothesized for respiratory rate during CO2 but not room-air breathing. Since few studies of respiratory physiologic response in pediatric anxiety disorders have been conducted and reports in adult PD indicate differences in other measures of respiratory physiologic response,5,6,23 we also report results for means and variability in tidal volume and minute ventilation.
Symptomatic measures included the API total score and the rate of panic attacks. These variables tested hypotheses on associations between parent or offspring diagnosis and symptomatic response to the procedure. For respiratory variables, we analyzed mean values during room-air and CO2 breathing for respiratory rate, tidal volume, and minute ventilation, as well as within-subject standard deviations. These variables tested hypotheses on associations between parent or offspring diagnosis and respiratory sensitivity to CO2. We also examined total time of CO2 exposure, as recorded during spirometry.
Explanatory variables include fixed effects (sex, age, diagnosis in offspring and parents) and random effects (family and subjects). Based on a priori hypotheses, API scores were examined at each point individually. For respiratory data, means during CO2 exposure were treated as a repeated measure in models controlling for baseline values and age. Total time of CO2 exposure was analyzed both as continuous and dichotomized (ie, whether subjects asked to terminate the procedure). Significance was defined as 2-tailed α = .05.
Because the API total score distribution was skewed, analyses rely on log-transformed data (Table 1 and Table 2). Repeated measures in the same individual or separate observations on individuals within the same family do not represent independent observations. As some family studies have done,22,24- 26 we applied mixed statistical models for binary/categorical (“panic attack”; request to terminate CO2 procedure) and continuous (API score, respiratory physiologic response, time of CO2 exposure) data, following procedures in the SAS PROC-MIXED, GEE, and GENMOD modules (SAS Institute, Cary, NC),27 so that within-sibling correlations were modeled.
For our primary analysis, 2 sets of models were fit. The initial set examined dependent measures (1) as a function of PD in parents, regardless of offspring diagnosis, and (2) as a function of ongoing anxiety disorders in offspring, regardless of parental diagnosis. Our previous studies had not included children with specific phobia as “affected,” because specific phobias are very common and typically not predictive of PD.16,28 Hence, to maintain consistency with previous studies, offspring with only specific phobia but no other anxiety disorder were considered unaffected. A second set of multivariate analyses included both offspring as well as parental diagnosis as predictors of the dependent measure.
Three sets of supplementary analyses followed these primary analyses. First, the purpose of this study was to investigate correlates of risk for PD. Offspring of parents with MDD provided an additional comparison group. Hence, an initial supplemental analysis compared offspring of parents with MDD without PD (n = 52) and offspring of psychiatrically healthy parents (n = 26), excluding the 64 offspring of parents with PD. None of the contrasts approached statistical significance (P values >.20). Therefore, given the absence of influence of parental MDD on the API score and respiration measures during CO2 exposure, the high-risk group includes offspring of parents with PD, regardless of parental MDD. Second, prior studies of CO2 hypersensitivity in adults compare unaffected relatives of patients with PD with unaffected relatives of patients without PD.11,13,14 Thus, to generate comparable data in this study, another set of supplementary analyses stratified subjects based on the presence or absence of an ongoing anxiety disorder in the offspring, prior to comparing dependent measures in offspring with and without parental PD. Finally, we compared API scores and respiratory measures in offspring of PD-plus-MDD vs PD-alone groups. No significant differences were obtained; consequently, these results are not reported.
Of 142 offspring, 24 were offspring of parents with only PD; 40, of parents with PD and MDD; 52, of parents with only MDD; and 26, of parents without PD or MDD (psychiatrically healthy parents). Table 1 presents sample characteristics as well as API scores in offspring stratified by parental history of PD and MDD. Groups did not differ in age, sex, IQ, or social class.29 A total of 45 offspring (32%) met criteria for a current anxiety disorder, excluding specific phobia. This included 19 subjects with only social anxiety disorder, 8 subjects with only separation anxiety disorder, 3 subjects with only generalized anxiety disorder, and 15 subjects with multiple anxiety disorders. Table 1 summarizes data on rates of anxiety disorders in offspring of parents with PD or MDD. To examine the association between parental psychopathology and offspring anxiety diagnosis, a multivariate logistic model treated anxiety disorder in offspring as the dependent variable and parental PD and MDD as predictors. This model found that parental MDD (χ2 = 6.2; P = .01) but not parental PD (χ2 = 3.2; P = .07) predicted a significantly increased rate of offspring anxiety disorders, though a trend was found for PD. Parental MDD and PD did not have a significant interaction on offspring anxiety disorders (χ2 = 1.3; P>.20). Table 1 also presents the frequency distribution of API raw scores and means of the log-transformed API total scores at baseline, before CO2 exposure (threat), and during CO2 exposure in offspring risk groups.
Table 2 presents characteristics of offspring stratified by presence of anxiety disorders. Offspring with and without anxiety did not differ significantly on demographic variables (ie, age, social class, or IQ), though there was a nonsignificant excess of girls among offspring with anxiety disorders. Table 2 also presents the API descriptive data in offspring with and without anxiety disorders.
Of 142 offspring, 132 had sufficient data acquired during CO2 exposure for analysis on all variables. Data for total API score were missing for 1 subject at baseline and 1 subject during CO2 exposure; 10 subjects had brief CO2 exposure, precluding analysis of physiologic data. On the whole, the procedure was not highly anxiogenic, as API scores were not high; across all conditions, only 23 (16%) of 142 offspring had scores of 10 or more.
Table 1 presents API scores during the 3 assessment points: baseline, threat, and CO2 breathing. To verify that the study condition produced significant changes in API symptoms, API scores were compared across baseline, threat, and CO2 exposure across offspring groups. Regardless of risk status or presence of anxiety disorder, offspring exhibited significantly higher API scores during CO2 exposure relative to the other epochs. Table 3 presents means for respiratory rate, tidal volume, and minute ventilation at baseline and the initial 5 minutes of CO2 exposure. All 3 respiratory measures showed robust increases during CO2 exposure (all P values <.001), supporting the internal validity of the procedures through expected physiologic effects.
As noted earlier, symptomatic response to CO2 exposure was examined through self-reports on the API and presence of panic attacks.
As shown in Table 1, no differences on the API were found at baseline between offspring at high and low risk for PD. No significant differences were obtained during CO2 exposure (F = 0.7; P>.20). In contrast, during the anticipatory threat period, high-risk offspring reported significantly higher API scores than low-risk offspring (F = 5.9; P<.01).
Panic attacks occurred in 16 (11%) of 142 offspring, all during CO2 exposure. The mean ± SD API total score among subjects with a panic attack was 12.1 ± 6.5 (range, 5-29) compared with 2.3 ± 3.0 (range, 0 to 15) in those without a panic attack. Frequency of panic attacks did not differ between high-risk (7 [11%] of 64) and low-risk offspring (9 [12%] of 78) (χ2 = 0.20; P>.20).
Length of CO2 exposure and rate of request for discontinuation of the CO2-inhalation procedure did not differentiate the high-risk from the low-risk offspring. Thus, 9 (15%) of 59 of the high-risk offspring vs 15 (21%) of 73 of the low-risk offspring asked that the procedure be terminated (χ2 = 1.7; P = .20).
Our main hypothesis predicted an elevation in respiratory rate among offspring at risk for PD relative to comparisons during CO2 inhalation. As presented in Table 3, we did not find evidence to support this hypothesis. Risk groups did not differ significantly on respiratory rate (F = 3.4; P = .06), tidal volume (F = 2.1; P = .14), minute ventilation (F = 0.11; P>.20), or ventilatory variability quantified by within-subject standard deviations for respiration rate (F = 0; P>.20), minute ventilation (F = 2.1; P = .15), and tidal volume (F = 2.6; P = .11).
The API scores at baseline did not differ between offspring with and without anxiety disorders. During CO2 inhalation, total API scores were higher in the anxious vs the nonanxious group, whether the model did (F = 5.2; P<.05) or did not (F = 5.4; P<.01) control for sex. During the threat epoch immediately before CO2 delivery, offspring with a current anxiety disorder reported significantly greater API scores than those without an anxiety disorder, whether sex was controlled (F = 11.2; P<.001) or not (F = 10.4; P<.001).
Rate of panic attacks was significantly elevated among offspring with anxiety disorders (10 [22%] of 45) compared with anxious offspring without anxiety disorders. The 16 cases consisted of 10 (22%) of 45 with a current anxiety disorder and 6 (6%) of 97 without a current anxiety disorder, a statistically significant difference (χ2 = 4.7; P<.05, controlling for sex).
Significantly more offspring with anxiety disorders (14 [31%] of 45) than without anxiety disorders (10 [11%] of 87) asked to terminate the CO2 procedure (χ2 = 4.9; P<.05). Length of CO2 exposure also was significantly lower (F = 7.9; P<.01) in offspring with anxiety disorders (mean ± SD, 12.4 ± 3.3 minutes) compared with those without anxiety disorders (mean ± SD, 14.0 ± 3.4 minutes).
The hypothesis that respiratory rate during CO2 exposure would be increased in children with anxiety disorders was supported (F = 4.4; P<.05). In contrast, no significant associations emerged with offspring anxiety diagnosis and respiratory variability, mean tidal volume, and minute ventilation.
Given prior results,16 we also conducted preliminary analyses for specific offspring diagnoses of social phobia, generalized anxiety, and separation anxiety disorders. Abnormal respiratory rate during CO2 exposure occurred only with separation anxiety disorder (F = 5.9; P = .01). While associations with separation anxiety disorder also emerged for symptom-based measures of CO2 hypersensitivity, these results should be considered preliminary, given the small sample size (n = 14) for cases with separation anxiety disorder, among whom 6 had another comorbid anxiety disorder. We will conduct comprehensive analyses of diagnostic specificity after completing attempts to enrich subgroups with specific disorders to allow more refined analyses.
Since API scores during threat were related to both PD in the parent as well as anxiety in the child, a further analysis examined the relationship between API scores during threat and both parental PD as well as offspring anxiety disorder, covarying for offspring sex. A significantly higher level of panic symptoms during threat was independently associated with offspring anxiety disorder (F = 10.7; P<.001) and parental PD (F = 4.3; P<.05). The association with sex was nonsignificant (F = 1.4; P>.20).
No interaction effect on API scores was found between offspring anxiety and parental PD (F = 0.3; P>.20), nor between parental PD and parental MDD (F = 1.0; P>.20). Similarly, no interactions emerged as predictors of physiologic variables (all P values >.20). Finally, parental PD did not predict symptomatic or physiologic response to CO2 exposure in the subset of cases free of an anxiety disorder. Thus, the presence of parental PD did not differentially influence response to CO2 exposure in offspring with or without an anxiety disorders.
The present study used a family-based design to test whether CO2 hypersensitivity is a familial vulnerability marker for PD. In addition, the current design extended prior findings to nonreferred children and adolescents with anxiety disorders to assess whether previous findings of CO2 sensitivity in referred children also characterized nonclinical cases.
A report of at-risk children and adolescents found faster resting respiratory rate and greater respiratory variability during a baseline period in 14 offspring of parents with PD compared with 10 offspring of unaffected parents.12 The current study did not find such differences in physiologic response at baseline. The absence of a relationship between baseline respiratory physiologic response in children and either ongoing anxiety in the child or PD in the parent argues against the notion that anxiety in young individuals is associated with perturbed respiratory physiologic response under conditions of no or relatively minor stress. Abnormalities in respiratory physiologic response among anxious children and adolescents emerge more consistently under conditions of stress.
Abnormal reactions to CO2 inhalation have been viewed as indicators of premorbid vulnerability for PD, based on the observation that CO2 hypersensitivity is found in a range of clinical populations related to PD. For example, it occurs in some pediatric anxiety disorders16,18 as well as in psychiatrically healthy, adult, first-degree relatives of patients with PD.11,13 We did not obtain support for the hypothesis of CO2 sensitivity as a familial vulnerability marker. Relative to comparisons, offspring of parents with PD did not report more panic symptoms or display greater respiratory changes during 5% CO2 breathing. In contrast, evidence for familial vulnerability did emerge during anticipation of CO2 exposure, immediately prior to CO2 exposure. Conceptualized as a threatening context, offspring of parents with PD, relative to offspring of parents without PD, exhibited elevated panic symptoms but normal respiratory physiologic response in this situation.
Five studies have examined CO2 sensitivity in adult offspring of patients with PD. Four used a single breath of 35% CO2, a concentration more anxiogenic than the 5% CO2 used in the current study. All found greater panic symptoms with 35% CO2 exposure in at-risk adult offspring than in comparisons.11,13,14,30,31 The fifth study used 35% as well as 5% CO2; associations between risk for PD and panic symptoms were found with 35% but not 5% CO2 exposure.11 Adult relatives of patients with PD in this fifth study also exhibited an abnormal minute ventilation response but a normal respiratory rate response to 5% CO2 and normal variability in respiratory parameters. Such physiologic findings differ from those typically found in adult PD, where, as in the current study, abnormalities emerge in the respiratory rate but not the minute ventilation response to 5% CO2. Other abnormalities, such as enhanced variability in respiration or perturbations in minute ventilation, emerge with less consistency.32 The 5% as opposed to 35% level of CO2 was selected in the current study to be consistent with the 3 previous CO2 studies in pediatric anxiety disorders.11- 13
Inconsistencies in CO2-inhalation studies of familial vulnerability may relate to several methodological factors. First, 5% CO2 is a less-potent panicogen than 35% CO2, as shown by higher rates of panic attacks with 35% vs 5% CO2 in patients with PD as well as psychiatrically healthy adults. Statistical power was limited in the current study by the low rate of panic attacks, and studies obtaining higher rates of panic attacks would possess greater statistical power. In light of these considerations, enhanced responses to 5% CO2 might occur only in subjects with ongoing anxiety disorders, as suggested by negative results among offspring with PD in the current study and the lone study of 5% CO2 in adult relatives of patients with PD.11 Thus, it may be that CO2 hypersensitivity, as a family-based marker of vulnerability to PD in at-risk children and adolescents, will be detectable only with higher than 5% CO2 concentrations.
Second, studies in adults with PD have reported contextual influences on respiration.3,33,34 To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine CO2 response in the home, a venue that is less threatening than a laboratory. However, contextual factors alone cannot account for the current negative findings, since parent-PD differences emerged during threat, which occurred in the same relatively “safe” context. In addition, we replicated findings of greater CO2 sensitivity among children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. Thus, consistent with our hypothesis, a significant relationship between CO2 response and current anxiety disorders was found. Similarly, it is conceivable that the confluence of risk in offspring through the presence of an anxiety disorder and a parental history of PD would enhance the detection of vulnerability. Such was not the case. Finally, during room-air breathing while anticipating CO2 exposure, ongoing anxiety disorders in the offspring and PD in a parent were independently associated with significantly higher levels of panic symptoms. Offspring anxiety and parental PD had additive rather than interaction effects. While these associations are consistent with findings in pediatric anxiety disorders,16,18 they differ insofar as adults with PD have more marked responses to CO2 than to its anticipation (before CO2 exposure).6,7
Previous reports compared healthy volunteers to children and adolescents referred to clinics for treatment of anxiety disorders. All found elevated panic symptoms before and during CO2 inhalation in patients, with larger effect sizes during CO2 exposure.16- 18 Across these studies, rate of panic attacks was 1% in 70 psychiatrically healthy subjects and 32% in 69 patients. In the current study, we found a rate of 6% in unaffected subjects and 22% in those with anxiety disorders. In terms of physiologic data, as in at least 7 prior studies of adult PD (Gorman et al6 and Pine et al16), studies in children and adolescents find patients with anxiety to exhibit elevated respiratory rates during CO2 inhalation.
Current findings should be considered in light of study limitations. Statistical power was limited by the low rate of panic attacks, as well as the relatively small number of at-risk offspring who are likely to develop PD. Some procedures may have increased levels of anticipatory anxiety. For example, to facilitate full disclosure, subjects were informed 3 times about the potential anxiogenic effect of CO2 inhalation. While this procedure did not influence compliance, it may have increased anticipatory anxiety. Similarly, the CO2-inhalation procedure was completed following a 2-hour assessment that involved tests of memory, a physical examination, and exposure to photographs of faces depicting various emotions. While anxiety elicited by these procedures is low, these procedures also may have facilitated anticipatory anxiety. Therefore, findings of greater panic symptoms during threat may reflect the combined effects of anticipation of CO2 exposure coupled with an effect of procedural factors that preceded respiratory monitoring. However, these factors are unlikely to account for negative results. Levels of panic symptoms prior to CO2 administration were higher in anxious offspring and those of patients with PD, suggesting that affected or at-risk groups are particularly susceptible to anticipatory anxiety. High levels of anticipatory anxiety are unlikely to contribute to negative findings, given that previous studies in both children and adults demonstrate that anticipatory anxiety predicts an enhanced, as opposed to a reduced, response to CO2.16
The current findings are based on at-risk offspring recruited through parents who had sought treatment for PD or MDD. Similar sampling strategies have been used in studies of familial risk,35,36 but they are vulnerable to referral biases. Importantly, 35% of eligible subjects declined participation. Though participants did not differ from nonparticipants in terms of parental or offspring psychopathology, it is possible that those who declined may have been particularly vulnerable to CO2 exposure, and their absence may have contributed to type II errors. In sum, this study of children and adolescents obtained support for CO2 sensitivity as a marker of anxiety but not as a familial risk factor for PD.
Correspondence: Daniel S. Pine, MD, National Institute of Mental Health, Bldg 15-K, Room 110, MSC-2670, Bethesda, MD 20817-2670 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Submitted for Publication: January 26, 2004; final revision received May 19, 2004; accepted June 10, 2004.
Funding/Support: This study was supported by grant R01 MH-59171 from the National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Md, and an Independent Investigator Award National from the Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression, Great Neck, NY (Dr Pine).