[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.127.188. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 91
Citations 0
Invited Critique
Jan 2012

Ethnicity, Insurance Status, and Hospitals Serving Predominantly MinoritiesComment on “Association Between Hospitals Caring for a Disproportionately High Percentage of Minority Patients With Trauma and Increased Mortality Due to Trauma”

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliation: Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

Arch Surg. 2012;147(1):70. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.220

It is a well-established fact that members of ethnic minority groups continue to have a disproportionately high number of medical diseases such as cardiovascular disease, human immunodeficiency virus, diabetes, and cancer.1,2 Trauma care, with its acute and emergent nature and its adherence to standardized protocols, was thought to be immune from racial disparities. However, this idea was proven to be false, thanks in large part to the work of Dr Haider and his colleagues, who documented the role that ethnicity and insurance status play after an individual receives a traumatic injury.3,4 In their current study,5 they attempt to answer the important question of why these racial disparities exist.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×