[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.92.62. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Invited Critique
July 2012

Single-Incision Laparoscopic CholecystectomyComment on “Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy”

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, Department of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Arch Surg. 2012;147(7):667. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2012.829

Twenty years after laparoscopy became the criterion standard for cholecystectomy, the advent of single-port surgery has deeply affected the general consensus. Single-port surgery has spurred major scientific interest as shown in numerous publications and backed up by forceful industrial marketing. As a new approach, SILC is systematically reviewed. After analyzing numerous variables (pain, cosmetic result, cost-effectiveness, and learning curve), Hall et al1 demonstrate that this technique tends to show no advantages, with the detriment of greater operative risks, and that its implementation remains debatable.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×