[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.130.145. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Resident's Forum
January 2013

Postoperative Pain Assessment and Analgesic Administration in Native American Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Author Affiliations
 

SECTION EDITORS: RICHARD D. SCHULICK, MD, MBA; PAMELA A. LIPSETT, MD, MPHE

Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery (Drs Lee, Hannallah, and Adamas-Rappaport) and College of Medicine (Drs Yazzie and Adamas-Rappaport and Ms Teeple), University of Arizona, Tucson; and Department of Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Bagrodia).

JAMA Surg. 2013;148(1):91-93. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.682
Abstract

Ethnic disparities in pain assessment and analgesic administration following surgery have received little attention in the surgery literature. We noted that our Native American patients were less likely than others to complain of pain. A retrospective chart review of 21 Native American patients and a control group who underwent outpatient, elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Native American patients had a statistically lower numeric pain score (mean, 6.5; 95% CI, 3.6-9.4) than non–Native American patients (mean, 8.1; 95% CI, 6.3-9.9; t38 = 2.63; P < .05). Native American patients also received less postsurgical analgesic (mean, 7.4; 95% CI, 4.0-10.8) than non–Native American patients (mean, 11.2; 95% CI, 7.2-15.2; t38 = 3.07; P < .01). Medical staff attending Native American patients should be aware that response to some scales to assess pain may not reflect accurately the degree of pain experienced.

×