[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.179.146. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 138
Citations 0
Invited Commentary
December 2014

It Is More Than Payment AccountabilityIt Is About Improvement, Too

Author Affiliations
  • 1Louisiana State University Health Science Center, New Orleans
JAMA Surg. 2014;149(12):1278. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2014.994

Using a large data set, Lucas et al1 studied the importance of appropriate risk adjustment when applying performance measures in payment and accountability programs. Despite limited variation in readmissions for colorectal cancer, a readmission rate of 12.3% should encourage all of us to strive to get below 10%. It is about improvement and accountability in payment and public reporting. The hierarchical logistic regression model used found variations in age, race, procedure, and comorbidities. Risk-adjusted readmission odds ratios revealed risks shared by all hospitals in these specific groups of variables. They also point to areas in need of focused improvements.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×