[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 50.16.107.222. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Moments in Surgical History
February 1998

Peter Rose and the Early American Surgical Instrument Trade

Arch Surg. 1998;133(2):228. doi:10-1001/pubs.Arch Surg.-ISSN-0004-0010-133-2-ssh0298

ESPECIALLY FOR THE 18th and 19th century American surgeon, the practice of surgery—the art, craft, and fledgling science of working with one's hands—was largely defined by its tools. At least prior to the acceptance of antisepsis and asepsis throughout this country (in the late 1880s), a better surgical instrument could lead to a better operative result. Progress in surgical instrumentation and surgical technique went "hand in hand." Philip Syng Physick (1768-1837) was an exemplar of this tradition when he devised an instrument that was the progenitor of all tonsil guillotines (1828). Seven decades later (1892), John Benjamin Murphy (1857-1916) conceived a small metal "button" that revolutionized surgery by demonstrating the feasibility of joining portions of the intestine without sutures. Physick's tools might have been handmade while Murphy's implement was machine manufactured, but their sheer presence highlighted the ability of the surgical instrument industry to assist surgeons in caring for patients.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×