What are the primary areas that future patient-reported outcomes (PROs) research should focus on?
An iterative web-based interface was used to create a modified Delphi survey for use at the inaugural Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgery (PROS) Conference to survey conference registrants including surgeons, PROs researchers, payers, and other stakeholders. The survey identified (1) PROs in the decision-making process, (2) challenges to integrating PROs into the electronic health record, and (3) PROs and the measurement of quality as the 3 most important areas for future research.
The research agenda generated from the PROS Conference will help researchers, surgeons, and funders identify crucial areas of future PROs research in surgery.
Identifying timely and important research questions using relevant patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in surgery remains paramount in the current medical climate. The inaugural Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgery (PROS) Conference brought together stakeholders in PROs research in surgery with the aim of creating a research agenda to help determine future directions and advance cross-disciplinary collaboration.
To create a research agenda to help determine future directions and advance cross-disciplinary collaboration on the use of PROs in surgery.
Design, Setting, and Participants
An iterative web-based interface was used to create a conference-based, modified Delphi survey for registrants at the PROS Conference (January 29-30, 2015), including surgeons, PRO researchers, payers, and other stakeholders. In round 1, research items were generated from qualitative review of responses to open-ended prompts. In round 2, items were ranked using a 5-point Likert scale; attendees were also asked to submit any new items. In round 3, the top 30 items and newly submitted items were redistributed for final ranking using a 3-point Likert scale. The top 20 items by mean rating were selected for the research agenda.
Main Outcomes and Measures
An expert-generated research agenda on PROs in surgery.
Of the 143 people registered for the conference, 137 provided valid email addresses. There was a wide range of attendees, with the 3 most common groups being plastic surgeons (28 [19.6%]), general surgeons (19 [13.3%]), and researchers (25 [17.5%]). In round 1, participants submitted 459 items, which were reduced through qualitative review to 53 distinct items across 7 themes of PROs research. A research agenda was formulated after 2 successive rounds of ranking. The research agenda identified 3 themes important for future PROs research in surgery: (1) PROs in the decision-making process, (2) integrating PROs into the electronic health record, and (3) measuring quality in surgery with PROs.
Conclusions and Relevance
The PROS Conference research agenda was created using a modified Delphi survey of stakeholders that will help researchers, surgeons, and funders identify crucial areas of future PROs research in surgery.
Pezold ML, Pusic AL, Cohen WA, Hollenberg JP, Butt Z, Flum DR, Temple LK. Defining a Research Agenda for Patient-Reported Outcomes in SurgeryUsing a Delphi Survey of Stakeholders. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(10):930-936. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1640