[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.147.69. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 170
Citations 0
Invited Commentary
October 2016

Quality of Care and Cost at Safety-Net Hospitals—Is Redistribution of Cases Possible?

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson
  • 2Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University, The State University of New York, Stony Brook
JAMA Surg. 2016;151(10):914-915. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1798

In this issue of JAMA Surgery, Go et al1 use University HealthSystem Consortium data to demonstrate that high-burden hospitals (HBHs), while providing a safety net and caring for the most severely ill patients, had worse outcomes and higher costs after pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with low-burden hospitals (LBHs) and medium-burden hospitals (MBHs). Sensitivity analyses were performed to simulate after pancreaticoduodenectomy (1) the effect of improved hospital performance and (2) the influence of redistribution of care on cost. In the model, a 50% reduction in drug-related group (DRG) codes for major and minor complications or comorbidities resulted in a $4607 decrease in cost per patient. Redistribution of patients to LBHs and MBHs resulted in a cost savings of $9155 per patient.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×