[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 130
Citations 0
Invited Commentary
May 10, 2017

The Role of Vena Cava Filters for Injured PatientsPlease Don’t Throw the Baby Out With the Bathwater

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 2Departments of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 3Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 4Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
JAMA Surg. Published online May 10, 2017. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1052

Prophylactic vena cava filter (VCF) use for pulmonary embolism (PE) prevention remains so controversial that there are opposing guideline recommendations from 2 major national organizations. While the American College of Chest Physicians recommends against VCF use, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma suggests they have some utility. These differing clinical opinions cause wide variation in VCF use.1

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview