[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.8.87. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Moments in Surgical History
November 1999

Amputation vs Nonamputation

Arch Surg. 1999;134(11):1284. doi:10.1001/archsurg.134.11.1284

DESPITE THE FACT that approximately 60,000 amputations were performed, the great surgical controversy of the Civil War concerned amputation vs nonamputation. Conservative surgeons and their overtly concerned civilian supporters wished to save a wounded extremity at any price. The radical "cutters" believed only in prompt amputation. At the start of the hostilities, conservatism seemed to hold sway. As early as June 1861, the US Sanitary Commission, a civilian-organized soldiers' relief society, authorized the printing of an American edition of the British Surgeon-General George Guthrie's (1785-1856) Directions to Army Surgeons on the Field of Battle. From his experiences at the Crimean front, Guthrie expounded the conservative viewpoint that a "leg should be seldom amputated for a fracture from a musket ball."

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×