[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Invited Critique
July 2000

Laparoscopy-Assisted Billroth I Gastrectomy Compared With Conventional Open Gastrectomy—Invited Critique

Arch Surg. 2000;135(7):810. doi:10.1001/archsurg.135.7.810

Adachi and his colleagues are to be commended for their results in a large series of patients with early-stage gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy (LAG) or conventional open gastrectomy (COG). They demonstrated several advantages of LAG over COG, including less surgical trauma, less impaired nutrition, less pain, rapid return of gastrointestinal function, shorter hospital stay, no decrease in operative curability. This approach has been adopted by more than a few Japanese surgeons since the first case of LAG for early gastric cancer performed by the same authors in 1994. Briefly, LAG consists of 2 procedures: (1) laparoscopic approach under the pneumoperitoneum and (2) resection of the stomach followed by hand-sawn anastomosis through a minilaparotomy incision.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview