[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 23.23.50.247. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Invited Critique
December 01, 2007

Meta-analysis of Short-term Outcomes of Randomized Controlled Trials of LigaSure vs Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy—Invited Critique

Arch Surg. 2007;142(12):1218. doi:10.1001/archsurg.142.12.1218

The authors performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing short-term outcomes in LigaSure and conventional hemorrhoidectomy. They found that operative time, blood loss, and pain on postoperative day 1 were significantly less following LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy than conventional hemorrhoidectomy. For minor procedures, blood loss is realistically not a significant factor and the difference in operative times is also not clinically significant. Pain, however, remains an important issue.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×