[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 1921

THE PROGNOSIS IN PROSTATECTOMY

Author Affiliations

John Rhea Barton Professor of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine; Surgeon-in-Chief to the Lankenau Hospital; Urologist to the Methodist Episcopal Hospital; Instructor in Urology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine; Assistant Surgeon, Pennsylvania Hospital PHILADELPHIA

Arch Surg. 1921;2(2):231-245. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1921.01110050049004
Abstract

The subject matter of this article, while largely statistical, has proved most instructive to us, and it is presented with the hope that the proverbial dryness of figures will be less arid in this instance, because of their importance. The material is based for the most part on data which we have collected in the preparation of the chapter on prognosis for the second edition of the monograph "Hypertrophy of the Prostate" by the senior author.

In contrasting the chapter on prognosis in the previous edition of the work with the present one, an interval of fifteen years having elapsed, one is immediately impressed with the vagueness, the uncertainty and the misgivings with which prostatectomy was viewed only a comparatively few years ago. Then it was a procedure to be adopted only after palliative treatment had been tried unsuccessfully. It is not necessary to review the developmental steps in our

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×