[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.169.191. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 1930

THE UNFAVORABLE RESULTS OF PHRENICECTOMY

Author Affiliations

NEW YORK
From the Department of Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons. New York, and the First Surgical Division, Bellevue Hospital.

Arch Surg. 1930;21(6):1125-1133. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1930.01150180241014
Abstract

During the past decade, a rather extensive literature has accumulated on the surgery of the phrenic nerve as applied to pulmonary tuberculosis, bronchiectasis and abscess of the lungs. This literature has become increasingly voluminous, particularly in the last four or five years. Most of the authors have dealt with the subject: (1) purely from the academic standpoint, (2) by reporting series of cases varying in number from 1 to 600, or (3) by combining both of the foregoing methods of approach. The technic of phrenicectomy and exaresis has been adequately described many times, and as a result the procedure, with minor individual variations, has become standardized. The accidents to be avoided and cautions against them have almost all been directed toward errors in technic and how to avoid them, and also to the possibility of grave and unavoidable mediastinal hemorrhage.

Among the technical errors that have occurred, even with experienced

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×