[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.204.161.30. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 1948

EVALUATION OF COLORECTECTOMY AND IMMEDIATE ANASTOMOSIS OF THE RECTUM

Author Affiliations

OMAHA
From the Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska College of Medicine, Omaha.; Fellow of the American College of Surgeons.

Arch Surg. 1948;56(5):681-692. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1948.01240010691012
Abstract

IN THE evolution of surgery for the extirpation of carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid, there is now a tendency to revert to the original operations for this malady. In 1898, Cadol,1 in France, published a historical review of the treatment of rectal cancer and reported that Lisfranc in 1826 was the first to extirpate a cancer of the lower part of the rectum. Colostomy was not used in conjunction with operations for removal of malignant lesions of the rectum until fifty years later. Lisfranc concluded that one should operate when the finger could go beyond the upper limits of the diseased area and the perirectal tissues were healthy, so that the rectum and tumor mass could be everted and the whole tumor with the anus excised, leaving a posterior rectal opening or fistula. Modifications of this technic were developed, but the rate of mortality was high, averaging 80

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×