[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.0.26. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
September 1949

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF JAUNDICE IN SURGICAL PRACTICE

Author Affiliations

ROCHESTER, MINN.
From the Division of Medicine, Mayo Clinic.

Arch Surg. 1949;59(3):793-806. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1949.01240040801039
Abstract

IN THE past two decades, several developments have influenced our clinical thinking in regard to jaundice. Many studies of the physiology of the liver in health have been made, and laboratory methods for studying hepatic disease have been developed. The latter have tended to detract from the time-honored and thoroughly tested clinical study of the jaundiced patient. The observations on the pandemic of infectious hepatitis during World War II have emphasized the importance of the parenchymatous type of jaundice. Some sequelae of this disease, such as homologous serum jaundice—serious and often fatal—acute and subacute atrophy and possibly chronic atrophy or cirrhosis, remain as current problems. Radical surgical procedures have been used for the relief of obstruction due to carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater and the head of the pancreas and for the relief of portal hypertension. Recognition of pancreatitis as a more frequent and clearcut syndrome has become disseminated

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×