[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
June 1951


Author Affiliations

Dr. Thomas is a Fellow in Surgery, Mayo Foundation; Dr. Waugh is from the Division of Surgery, and Dr. Dockerty from the Division of Surgical Pathology, Mayo Clinic.

AMA Arch Surg. 1951;62(6):847-855. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1951.01250030858012

IT IS POSSIBLE that total gastrectomy is the treatment of choice in all carcinomas of the stomach.1 Because of the excessive gravity of this suggestion, its worth should be critically evaluated from every possible angle before it is generally adopted.

A mere philosophy of radicalism is not sufficient. The concept of removing the entire substance of any nonvital organ harboring cancer is not necessarily valid. This concept carried to the point of absurdity would suggest the removal of the entire face for a small basal cell carcinoma. A more valid, and probably more radical over-all concept, is that of removing all areas suggested by the known pathologic characteristics of a given malignant lesion.

Strict observance of the pathologic aspects of malignancy has seldom failed to bear surgical fruit. This is true regardless of whether it leads to a more conservative or a more radical operation. In any historical review

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview