[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.176.107. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 1953

LATE PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL EMBOLECTOMY

Author Affiliations

CHICAGO
From the Department of Surgery of the Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, Ill., the Presbyterian Hospital of the City of Chicago and the Chicago Memorial Hospital.

AMA Arch Surg. 1953;66(4):480-487. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1953.01260030495016
Abstract

UNDOUBTEDLY a major factor in success or failure in peripheral arterial embolectomy has been the time elapsing between the occurrence of the embolism and surgery. There is no uniform agreement on the limits of the optimum period for embolectomy. McClure and Harkins1 set the first 12 hours as the optimum period. Heanley2 would have the surgery done in the first 10 hours. Pearse,3 in reviewing 282 embolectomies, found little difference between the results of those done in the first and those done in the second five-hour periods. The combined average of successful operations in these two periods was 40. The average of the second 10-hour period was 14%, and of the third was 8%. He concluded that after 48 hours the operation was not worth doing. He attributes failure to ( 1 ) the formation of a thrombus distal to the embolus, so-called "tail thrombus," and (2) changes in

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×