[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 174.129.114.211. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
January 1961

Comparison of Peripheral Arterial GraftsExperimental Observations of Hemodynamic Changes Using Cineangiography

Author Affiliations

ROCHESTER, N.Y.
Dept. of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center.; From the Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center.; Research Fellow of the National Heart Institute, U.S. Public Health Service (HF 10257) (Dr. Phillips).

Arch Surg. 1961;82(1):38-48. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1961.01300070042006
Abstract

The concept of direct reconstruction of damaged and diseased arteries is generally accepted. Currently, the most popular materials used for arterial replacement are autogenous veins and crimped tubes of Dacron and Teflon developed by De Bakey and Edwards and Tapp.2-4,8-10,14,15,32 Experimental comparisons of several different replacement materials have been reported.* There are not, however, similar comparisons of the readily available materials currently in use in clinics throughout the country. The first portion of this study is a controlled comparison of these materials when used to bypass short segments of the canine femoral artery.

Heretofore, comparative hemodynamic studies of arterial replacements have been concerned primarily with pulse transmission,25 graft elasticity,24 and relative flow rates.27 Actual visualization of flow patterns usually has been accomplished by forcing suspended particles through rigid transparent models.11,26-31 Refined cineangiographic techniques, however, are available to study in vivo fluid mechanics.1,30 The second

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×