[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 1970

Principles of Surgery

Author Affiliations

Cambridge, Mass

Arch Surg. 1970;100(5):632. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1970.01340230098027

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

In today's world of hyperspecialization and rapidly changing medical knowledge a surgical text can be enigmatic. In the blur created by rapid change, it is gratifying to find one that provides the reader with a focus.

A text is judged by various criteria:

  1. Is it well organized?

  2. Is it complete?

  3. Is it accurate (up to date)?

  4. Is the bibliography good (selective rather than overwhelming or indiscriminate)?

  5. Is it usable?

The last is probably the most important criterion. An accurate, complete, well organized text may be unusable due to weak or laborious style, hackneyed photos, illustrations or charts, archaic regurgitations of material from other texts, or dreary inconclusive reviews of every debatable point or both.

Schwartz's Principles of Surgery rates a "very good" in most of these areas, but it excels in "usability." The style is readable, the information is concise and important, and the material

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×