[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.191.72. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 1970

Heart Valve Replacement in the 1970s

Arch Surg. 1970;101(1):93. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1970.01340250095024

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

If heart valve replacement in the 1960s was characterized primarily by the mechanical prosthesis, it would appear that this next decade will see full evaluation of various kinds of tissue valves.

That bellwether of the prostheses, the caged-ball valve, has as its counterpart the homograft valve, usually the aortic valve which has been ingeniously adapted for use also in either atrioventricular ring. Ross and Paneth in England and Barratt-Boyes of New Zealand have wide experience with homograft replacement of the aortic valve, but late calcification and disruption brought into question the techniques of valve sterilization and preservation. Now it seems that the fresh or living homograft may be the valve replacement of choice. Any form of sterilization kills the valve transplant and predisposes to calcific infiltration. The fresh valve is not rejected or is rejected only very slowly, pari passu with healing, because the cusps are so poorly vascularized. The

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×