[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.130.145. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 1973

Suprapubic Bladder Drainage in General Surgery

Author Affiliations

Albuquerque, NM
From the surgical departments of St. Joseph Hospital, Presbyterian Hospital Center, and Memorial Hospital, Albuquerque, NM.

Arch Surg. 1973;106(4):568-572. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1973.01350160180031
Abstract

Pilot study of cholecystectomy patients showed 6% developed urinary tract infections. Perioperative urethral catheterization was required in 30%, of which 20% developed symptomatic urinary tract infection. This high postoperative morbidity related solely to the genitourinary tract prompted us to investigate an alternative procedure. During intra-abdominal procedures, 300 patients had routine, intra-operative, percutaneous, suprapubic insertions of Supracath (group A) or suprapubic Foley (group B) catheter. In group A, 3.7% mechanical complications and 8.2% bacteriuria were noted. Bacteriuria dropped to 2.7% if catheters functioned until removal. In group B there were no mechanical complications and 35% incidence of bacteriuria (100% for urethral catheters inserted an equal length of time).

Suprapubic catheterization affords much lower incidence of bacteriuria than urethral catheterization and, more importantly, absence of symptomatic urinary tract infection. This technique additionally offers advantages of simplicity and complete patient comfort and acceptance.

×