[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
December 1973

Boston Interhospital Amputation Study

Arch Surg. 1973;107(6):830. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1973.01350240002002

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


Management of the amputee is an interdisciplinary team function. The surgeon cannot provide the prosthesis and only in exceptional circumstances is he knowledgeable in the physical aspects of rehabilitation beyond the immediate surgical experience. Also, he is generally not willing to spend the time required for this most important and certainly most rewarding restorative period of care.

The great majority of amputees in this country do not enjoy the advantages of integrated team support. Warren and his associates, as reported in this issue (see p 861), set about to provide skilled team services on a voluntary regional and community basis. This is a progressive and landmark experience. The results documented here should provoke critical self-evaluation by all surgeons performing amputations. Is the surgeon who performs the amputation fully aware of the value of this management as appropriate to modern and effective amputee rehabilitation? Is his knowledge of the amputation itself

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview