[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.94.5. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 1975

Surgeon, Spare That Saphena!

Author Affiliations

Portsmouth, Va

Arch Surg. 1975;110(7):848. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360130080026

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor.—The greater saphenous vein is the best choice for an autogenous replacement in femoropopliteal arterial reconstruction. Increasing use of the saphenous vein has multiplied its value, and should stimulate a more careful appraisal of surgical indications by the surgeon who proposes to remove it to treat symptoms in the lower extremity.

During past years, most surgeons will admit to having occasionally stripped the saphenous vein where the symptoms did not exactly match the clinical findings. Often the conditions of these patients were improved, and improvement was considered enough. It now seems appropriate to submit that such latitude may no longer be permissible.

As the greater saphenous vein assumes a higher value to its owner, so must the surgeon regard more carefully his inclination to operate for symptoms where physical signs are less than striking. Thus, he might reasonably ask himself the following questions:

  1. Is there clear

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×