[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 1977

Controversial Issues in Management of Carcinoma of the Rectum

Author Affiliations

Edited by Jerome J. DeCosse, MD, Professor and Chairman, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.; Members of the panel: Jerome J. DeCosse, MD, Professor and Chairman, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; George E. Block, MD, Professor of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine; Edward S. R. Hughes, MD, MS, Professor of Surgery, Monash Medical School at Alfred Hospital, Prahan, Victoria, Australia; Stuart H. Q. Quan, MD, Memorial Hospital, New York; Malcolm C. Veidenheimer, MD, Lahey, Clinic, Boston.

Arch Surg. 1977;112(5):558-563. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1977.01370050018003
Abstract

DR DE COSSE: The treatment of carcinoma of the rectum generates a substantial amount of controversy that seems to center around the relative indications for abdominoperineal resection, posterior resection, pull-through operations, anterior resection, or electrocoagulation. To these options may be added the role of radiation therapy.

For the sake of focusing on these issues, we might first ask whether there is agreement on certain "accepted" principles in the treatment of these patients. These include:

  1. The importance of multiple biopsies and determination of mobility in the preoperative assessment of a rectal tumor.

  2. The value of accurate preoperative measurement of the tumor and its relationship to the dentate line.

  3. The importance of a barium enema examination to rule out multiple malignancies or colon polyps.

  4. Irrespective of the virtues of oral antibiotic therapy, a thorough preoperative mechanical cleansing of the colon.

Dr Block: While accepting the importance of multiple

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×